Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Google News does a VERY insensitive thing

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #61
    Originally posted by Provost Harrison
    Remember, one man's terrorist is another man's freedom fighter...and there is no escaping that axiom.
    I'm sorry but that is STUPID.

    It shows a confusion between goals and means.

    When you describe a person as a "freedom fighter" you are describing his goal - freedom. Whether his own, or of a group. A "freedom fighter" can use different means to achieve his goal.

    When you describe a person as a "terrorist" you are describing his method of fighting: intentionally targetting civilians with the purpose of creating public histeria and pressure on the governing body. A "terrorist" can use this tactic to achieve different goals - ranging from freedom to hard cash.

    Thus taking Hamas and Hezballah for instance - they are udoubtedly terrorist as they employ terrorist means.

    Hezballah was a "Freedom fighter" - fighting to free Lebanon from Israel (But not from Syria. Lebanon is still under Syrian military occupation).

    Hamas would be a "freedom fighter" if you would call their goal - 'the removal of all jews and jewish entities from palestine' - "freedom". I would call it genocide. Thus they are 'genocide fighters'.

    And if you think that Hamas goals are only limited to the 67 borders - you are welcome to take a peek at their website.

    Comment


    • #62
      That damn American Independence movement...George Washington was nothing but a terrorist...

      See?
      Speaking of Erith:

      "It's not twinned with anywhere, but it does have a suicide pact with Dagenham" - Linda Smith

      Comment

      Working...
      X