Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

AAA faces [spurious] lawsuit

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • AAA faces [spurious] lawsuit



    AAA on Trial in Slaying of Motorist

    By DENISE LAVOIE, Associated Press Writer

    BOSTON - In the summer of 1999, AAA got a call about a young woman whose car had broken down in a parking lot on Cape Cod. The auto club told the woman's stepfather it would send help.

    Melissa Gosule never made it home that night.

    Her body was found in a shallow grave eight days later. She had been raped and stabbed to death.

    Gosule's family sued AAA for unspecified damages, claiming that if the auto club had done its job that night, she would be alive today. Jury selection began Monday in state court in the negligence and wrongful-death case.

    The case is being watched closely because it is the first time AAA has been sued in the death of a motorist who was killed after seeking assistance from the auto club, legal experts said.

    Every year, the American Automobile Association, with a dues-paying membership of more than 46 million in the United States and Canada, gets about 30 million calls from motorists who need help with dead batteries, flat tires and other roadside problems.

    In their lawsuit, Gosule's parents, Leslie Gosule and Sandra Glaser, and her stepfather, Peter Glaser, claim AAA left Gosule stranded and forced to turn to a stranger for help. That stranger, Michael Gentile, killed her.

    "AAA is not who they say they are," Leslie Gosule said recently in a statement. "Had AAA done what they tell the world they do and what they said they were going to do — provide reliable and reasonable emergency roadside assistance that night — Melissa would still be with us."

    Gosule's parents note that AAA, in its marketing materials, touts the peace of mind it provides to motorists in trouble. "One call to AAA and your worries are over," reads one brochure. AAA also refers to itself as "family" and warns against depending on strangers: "In today's world, relying on strangers has become a scary (and sometimes dangerous) thing to do."

    The lawsuit names national AAA; its local affiliate, AAA Southern New England; and the tow truck driver.

    AAA disputes the family's claims that it did not offer Gosule help, and says it should not be held responsible for her death. Gentile, a newspaper delivery man with a long criminal record, was convicted of her murder and is now serving a life sentence.

    On July 11, 1999, Gosule, a 27-year-old elementary school teacher, had returned at 5:30 p.m. from a bike ride at a park in Bourne to find that her 1986 Pontiac would not start.

    It was about that time that she met Gentile, according to testimony during Gentile's trial in 2000.

    Gosule used Gentile's cell phone to call her mother and stepfather, who told her he would call AAA for help. Gosule was not a member of AAA, but her stepfather was, and it is routine for the auto club to help out relatives of AAA members.

    In their lawsuit, Gosule's family says her stepfather immediately called the AAA's 24-hour emergency roadside assistance number and asked that the car and Gosule be taken to a garage in Boston. John Cubellis, a tow truck driver whose company is an agent for AAA, arrived at the parking lot about 90 minutes later.

    According to both sides, Cubellis told Gosule he was busy and it would be three to four hours before he could take her or her car to Boston, about 60 miles away. The Gosule family says Cubellis did not try to start the young woman's car, make sure she was taken to a safe location or call another AAA driver to help.

    Gosule then accepted a ride from Gentile.

    In court papers, AAA says Cubellis had no reason to believe Gosule was in danger. She was in a busy parking lot at the Sagamore Rotary with restaurants, a gas station and a fire station nearby. When he pulled into the parking lot, he saw Gosule talking and sharing a cell phone with two men — Gentile and a mechanic friend Gentile had called to look at the woman's car.

    AAA says Gosule could have taken a taxi or had a family member come pick her up.

    In a statement, a spokesman for AAA Southern New England called Gosule's death a "terrible tragedy."

    "Our hearts go out to Melissa Gosule's family and friends," said Robert Murray. "In our history, we have never seen a case like this. We believe the auto club will be properly and completely exonerated."

    Paul Martinek, editor in chief of Lawyers Weekly USA, a national legal newspaper, said the lawsuit was initially considered a long shot, but some of the claims could resonate with a jury.

    "Proving that this was a foreseeable danger is a huge challenge — that AAA could have foreseen that a motorist would have accepted a ride from a total stranger and then be killed by that total stranger," Martinek said.

    "But when you read these things about how AAA holds itself out as a protector of motorists and basically tries to get business by representing itself as a service that motorists need in part because it can be dangerous when your car breaks down, you start to see the lawsuit in a different light."
    It's a horrible thing to have happen, but I can't see how AAA is legally responsible in this matter. First, she wasn't even a AAA member. While AAA may extend services to relatives, they are under no legal obligation to do so, so they went well beyond any responsibility they had. Second, AAA in no way forced her to hitch a ride with a stranger. She was an adult who got into a car with a stranger of her own volition. She could have taken any number of alternatives, but she made the bad choice to accept the ride.

    The language used by the family smacks of canned rhetoric used to attack any organization when a large cash amount is desired.
    Tutto nel mondo è burla

  • #2
    spurious lawsuit? no such thing!

    its not their fault for sueing. its the systems fault for letting them win.

    Comment


    • #3
      I refer to the McDonald's/too-hot coffee case, which won national attention as well as around $150,000 (of course, the plaintiff received about $50K after the lawyers' and court fees).

      I also would like to remember OJ Simpson, who gave soap opera stars a year-long respite, much to the chagrin of the production staff.
      -30-

      Comment


      • #4
        Originally posted by st_swithin
        I refer to the McDonald's/too-hot coffee case, which won national attention as well as around $150,000 (of course, the plaintiff received about $50K after the lawyers' and court fees).

        I also would like to remember OJ Simpson, who gave soap opera stars a year-long respite, much to the chagrin of the production staff.
        yah they shouldn't have won. still not their fault. the system is suppose to decide the merit. thats why they have trials.

        Comment


        • #5
          Trials are a FARCE. A judge, a couple of guys arguing for people who refuse to argue for themselves, and 12 hand-picked "peers" who've never met ANY of these people and have absolutely NO interest in the case (as far as can be ascertained) whatsoever.

          Sounds more like a shotgun wedding than a fair day in court.

          My peers are the people who know me and what I do and who I am (like most of you guys here on 'poly).

          When did the legal system pervert the definition of "peers" to "people who have absolutely no idea what's going on"?
          -30-

          Comment


          • #6
            Originally posted by st_swithin
            Trials are a FARCE. A judge, a couple of guys arguing for people who refuse to argue for themselves, and 12 hand-picked "peers" who've never met ANY of these people and have absolutely NO interest in the case (as far as can be ascertained) whatsoever.

            Sounds more like a shotgun wedding than a fair day in court.

            My peers are the people who know me and what I do and who I am (like most of you guys here on 'poly).

            When did the legal system pervert the definition of "peers" to "people who have absolutely no idea what's going on"?
            =D

            Comment


            • #7
              further proof that america is beyond redemption. i'm leaving, setting up a new america, one that will actually stay true to what this country once stood for.

              at least, it'll stay true to it for about a hundred and fifty years or so, before damned mouthbreathers start outnumbering intelligent people.
              B♭3

              Comment


              • #8
                Originally posted by st_swithin
                \and 12 hand-picked "peers" who've never met ANY of these people and have absolutely NO interest in the case (as far as can be ascertained) whatsoever.
                Isn't that the idea? If my jury had an interest in freeing me they wouldn't be a very impartial body.
                Lime roots and treachery!
                "Eventually you're left with a bunch of unmemorable posters like Cyclotron, pretending that they actually know anything about who they're debating pointless crap with." - Drake Tungsten

                Comment


                • #9
                  Originally posted by st_swithin
                  I refer to the McDonald's/too-hot coffee case, which won national attention as well as around $150,000 (of course, the plaintiff received about $50K after the lawyers' and court fees).
                  Oh, yes, isn't one's lap where everybody stores hot liquids in opened containers, especially before driving?

                  I frequently use mine as a reservoir for molten ore, and as a rest home for indigent taipans.

                  What's next? Ted Bundy's victim's sue his parents for poor parenting skills? John Gacy's sue Rosalyn Carter for not recognising a mass murderer?

                  **** the Butcher's advice seems more sensible every day-

                  The Second Part of King Henry the Sixth, Act IV Scene 2.

                  JACK CADE, is a rebel, and **** THE BUTCHER, is a follower of Cade -

                  CADE. 'Be brave, then, for your captain is brave, and vows reformation. There shall be in England seven halfpenny loaves sold for a penny; the three-hoop'd pot shall have ten hoops; and I will make it felony to drink small beer. All the realm shall be in common, and in Cheapside shall my palfrey go to grass. And when I am king- as king I will be'

                  ALL. 'God save your Majesty!'

                  CADE. 'I thank you, good people- there shall be no money; all shall eat and drink on my score, and I will apparel them all in one livery, that they may agree like brothers and worship me their lord.'

                  ****. 'The first thing we do, let's kill all the lawyers.'
                  Vive la liberte. Noor Inayat Khan, Dachau.

                  ...patriotism is not enough. I must have no hatred or bitterness towards anyone. Edith Cavell, 1915

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    I'm not sure I understand something. It seems that the thing that caused her to be forced to take a ride from the killer was her dad's request that the car be taken to Boston 60 miles away. It looks like to me that knowing the tow truck couldn't take her immediatly, she would have settled for something more local. That way her car would have been safe and she could have rode with the tow truck driver instead of the killer.
                    Which side are we on? We're on the side of the demons, Chief. We are evil men in the gardens of paradise, sent by the forces of death to spread devastation and destruction wherever we go. I'm surprised you didn't know that. --Saul Tigh

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      Originally posted by st_swithin
                      Trials are a FARCE.


                      Everyone always brings up the Micky D's suit. The fact that it is so notorius should clue you into the fact that it is an outlier. Can you name another outrageous verdict of the top of your head? Thought not ...

                      (And BTW, consumer stupidity is not a defense to products liability when an alternate design scheme is feasible and consumer behavior is fairly standard as it is with placing drinks between the legs while driving. How about understanding the law before you shoot your mouth off. In fact, looking at CTP 2, you should talk about game design either ...)

                      Then again, what is the alternative to trials? Beating each other over the head?
                      - "A picture may be worth a thousand words, but it still ain't a part number." - Ron Reynolds
                      - I went to Zanarkand, and all I got was this lousy aeon!
                      - "... over 10 members raised complaints about you... and jerk was one of the nicer things they called you" - Ming

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        I do think AAA can and should be sued.

                        That's a horrible thing to have happen. These people are paying for this service after all.

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          I refer to the McDonald's/too-hot coffee case, which won national attention as well as around $150,000 (of course, the plaintiff received about $50K after the lawyers' and court fees).


                          It was MUCH less than that. People focus on the McD's suit in lower courts, but fail to see where the damages are significantly lowered on appeal.

                          Also the interesting thing with the McD's case is that the coffee was much, much too hot. The cup in which she was served was melting already when she took it. That's a little bit negligent, I'd say.

                          This case will probably have nothing come of it, but the tow truck driver should have tried something with the car. Maybe take a look at it and try and jump start it, or call another driver that could take her to Boston.
                          “I give you a new commandment, that you love one another. Just as I have loved you, you also should love one another. By this everyone will know that you are my disciples, if you have love for one another.”
                          - John 13:34-35 (NRSV)

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            Also the interesting thing with the McD's case is that the coffee was much, much too hot. The cup in which she was served was melting already when she took it. That's a little bit negligent, I'd say.


                            According to this site, polystyrene softens around 150 degrees C. Given the boiling point of water, how could the cup be "melting already"?
                            No, I did not steal that from somebody on Something Awful.

                            Comment


                            • #15
                              Just punch my button, will ya!

                              Originally posted by The Templar
                              Everyone always brings up the Micky D's suit. The fact that it is so notorius should clue you into the fact that it is an outlier. Can you name another outrageous verdict of the top of your head? Thought not ...

                              (And BTW, consumer stupidity is not a defense to products liability when an alternate design scheme is feasible and consumer behavior is fairly standard as it is with placing drinks between the legs while driving. )
                              First, I have never, ever seen anybody place a hot drink of any kind between the legs, or heard of anyone doing so apart from this case (which generated many a comment from coffee drinkers).
                              Anybody who would do so is an imbecile who should learn the lesson the hard way. I have compassion only in regards to the degree of suffering (assuming that was not overstated for the case).

                              Imran, the original verdict was $1.8 million, IIRC. The $150k figure is the appeal reduction. Unless it went through a second round of appeals by the plaintiff that backfired… that would be poignant.

                              I can think of many outrageous consumer product verdicts, two off the toppa me head: the silicone breast implant case (bad science), and the Pacific Gas & Electric case on which the film Erin Brockovich is based (really bad science, see the exposé from Wall Street Journal).

                              Product liability and pollution cases are argued by lawyers ignorant of science before judges ignorant of science to juries even more ignorant of both law and science. I am a firm believer in tort reform and codification.
                              (\__/) Save a bunny, eat more Smurf!
                              (='.'=) Sponsored by the National Smurfmeat Council
                              (")_(") Smurf, the original blue meat! © 1999, patent pending, ® and ™ (except that "Smurf" bit)

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              X