Because August was frenetically busy for me, I decided to take a month off from the discussion group and start it up again in September. Remember: next months book is The Dune Chronicles (the entire series, not just the first book).
Book: The Man in the High Castle
Author: Philip K. ****
Published: 1962
There are a few books that one reads that, even though you are quite capable of understanding the words, you can't make the sense of them, much less figure why this book is held in such high esteem by others. To me, the top book in this category is Ted Sturgeons More Than Human, which I thought was a complete waste - no ideas, all style, pretty full of boredom.
High Castle brought back a little of that feeling for me... though I've read the book twice since purchasing it, I'm still wondering: What's the point? Did anything actually happen in this book? Perhaps I'm too linear in my expectations, but still... just what was this book about? "Slice of life" stories are fine... as long as you can find an interesting slice of the life you're writing about.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/5a262/5a2628f3ed33df8f05f720a168bb46c4b9e7b8d6" alt="Wink"
I found his portrayal of the Japanese as the most rational and least emotive (and least racist!) of peoples to be almost laughable - while the Japanese are fine people, how PKD could not have been aware of their ability to go from wild Xenophobics to cultural assimilators and back is amazing. Had he not heard of the Nanking Massacre? Did he never look up the definition of the traditional Japanese word for foreigners, gaijin, which translates into, iirc, "foreign devils", i.e., if you're not Japanese you are, by default, a devil and not to be trusted. This is one of those things which sticks out so badly that my enjoyment of the rest of the book suffers by comparison.
I sent a PM to Drake seeing if he could give some insight into the Japanese mindset - hopefully, he'll participate (I have no idea if he has read the book).
Book: The Man in the High Castle
Author: Philip K. ****
Published: 1962
There are a few books that one reads that, even though you are quite capable of understanding the words, you can't make the sense of them, much less figure why this book is held in such high esteem by others. To me, the top book in this category is Ted Sturgeons More Than Human, which I thought was a complete waste - no ideas, all style, pretty full of boredom.
High Castle brought back a little of that feeling for me... though I've read the book twice since purchasing it, I'm still wondering: What's the point? Did anything actually happen in this book? Perhaps I'm too linear in my expectations, but still... just what was this book about? "Slice of life" stories are fine... as long as you can find an interesting slice of the life you're writing about.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/5a262/5a2628f3ed33df8f05f720a168bb46c4b9e7b8d6" alt="Wink"
I found his portrayal of the Japanese as the most rational and least emotive (and least racist!) of peoples to be almost laughable - while the Japanese are fine people, how PKD could not have been aware of their ability to go from wild Xenophobics to cultural assimilators and back is amazing. Had he not heard of the Nanking Massacre? Did he never look up the definition of the traditional Japanese word for foreigners, gaijin, which translates into, iirc, "foreign devils", i.e., if you're not Japanese you are, by default, a devil and not to be trusted. This is one of those things which sticks out so badly that my enjoyment of the rest of the book suffers by comparison.
I sent a PM to Drake seeing if he could give some insight into the Japanese mindset - hopefully, he'll participate (I have no idea if he has read the book).
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a9e10/a9e102d8b93c240991f356f9b0e62203a25ae2dc" alt="expect"
Comment