Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Car bomb kills al-Hakim

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #46
    Why did they kill 23 UN staffs who came here just to help Iraq ?

    Under terrorism, the standard political calculations do not work.
    Statistical anomaly.
    The only thing necessary for the triumph of evil is for good men to do nothing.

    Comment


    • #47
      Another angle to the "you think you used enough dynamite there, Butch?" approach is that it casues some confusion as to who's responsible by deviating from the pattern of attacks used by Sadr's boys in the past.

      There's an even bigger twist in that the spectacular size and effect of the blast will get much more attention and help (along with the UN bombing) spread the perception among a lot of Iraqis that the Americans can't secure the country.

      I doubt it's morons who didn't know how much explosive to use - seems much more likely to me that this bombing was a message meant for several parties.
      When all else fails, blame brown people. | Hire a teen, while they still know it all. | Trump-Palin 2016. "You're fired." "I quit."

      Comment


      • #48
        Originally posted by DAVOUT
        Why did they kill 23 UN staffs who came here just to help Iraq ?

        Under terrorism, the standard political calculations do not work.

        Because the folks who did that, Baathists most likely, did NOT want to help Iraq, they want to stop reconstruction so they can bring the occupation down and regain power. They attacked the UN rather than say a US base, cause the UN was less well protected, and they MAY be getting desperate.

        Al qaeedas attacks too are explicable in terms of a politial strategy, even if a rather far fetched one. Stratfor has been outlining it since 9/11, and their analysis continues to make sense.
        "A person cannot approach the divine by reaching beyond the human. To become human, is what this individual person, has been created for.” Martin Buber

        Comment


        • #49
          75 dead so far. It appears that Saddam does not want to give up his status of the greatist killer of muslims.
          Gaius Mucius Scaevola Sinistra
          Japher: "crap, did I just post in this thread?"
          "Bloody hell, Lefty.....number one in my list of persons I have no intention of annoying, ever." Bugs ****ing Bunny
          From a 6th grader who readily adpated to internet culture: "Pay attention now, because your opinions suck"

          Comment


          • #50
            Originally posted by MichaeltheGreat
            seems much more likely to me that this bombing was a message meant for several parties.
            I agree. Simple explanations are misleading because the terrorist act is build to misled. It is therefore safer to contemplate all possibilities, even the most crazy or senseless.

            The very important fact is that from now on Iraq has to be put under some sort of martial law, and that the ordinary military must be complemented by a counter-terrorism force, using terrorists ways and means.
            Statistical anomaly.
            The only thing necessary for the triumph of evil is for good men to do nothing.

            Comment


            • #51
              Hello! Iraq already is under martial law!

              And terrorist tactics are overrated in effectiveness. At least for the stuff that we need to do.
              I came upon a barroom full of bad Salon pictures in which men with hats on the backs of their heads were wolfing food from a counter. It was the institution of the "free lunch" I had struck. You paid for a drink and got as much as you wanted to eat. For something less than a rupee a day a man can feed himself sumptuously in San Francisco, even though he be a bankrupt. Remember this if ever you are stranded in these parts. ~ Rudyard Kipling, 1891

              Comment


              • #52
                Originally posted by DanS
                Hello! Iraq already is under martial law!

                And terrorist tactics are overrated in effectiveness. At least for the stuff that we need to do.
                Explain that to the 90 casualties.

                By the way, do you know how and when the martial law was declared to the population, and what obligations and restrictions it creates?
                Statistical anomaly.
                The only thing necessary for the triumph of evil is for good men to do nothing.

                Comment


                • #53
                  reuters continues to qupte witnesses who claim it was Hakims own car that blew up - CNN says this is uncertain - AP and BBC dont mention it at all.

                  If it WAS Hakims own car, that points to an inside job, by an organization that infiltrated SCIRI - most likely Iran, IMO.
                  "A person cannot approach the divine by reaching beyond the human. To become human, is what this individual person, has been created for.” Martin Buber

                  Comment


                  • #54
                    Originally posted by DanS
                    Hello! Iraq already is under martial law!

                    And terrorist tactics are overrated in effectiveness. At least for the stuff that we need to do.
                    IIUC arrested criminals are tried by the newly formed IRaqi civilian courts, so theyre not actually under martial, just military occupation.
                    "A person cannot approach the divine by reaching beyond the human. To become human, is what this individual person, has been created for.” Martin Buber

                    Comment


                    • #55
                      By the way, do you know how and when the martial law was declared to the population, and what obligations and restrictions it creates?
                      Nope. And who cares?

                      At least Baghdad is under 11 pm curfew and you have the military providing the bulk of law enforcement based upon procedures that are made up by the military.

                      Leave the semantics to Roland and the other lawyers.
                      I came upon a barroom full of bad Salon pictures in which men with hats on the backs of their heads were wolfing food from a counter. It was the institution of the "free lunch" I had struck. You paid for a drink and got as much as you wanted to eat. For something less than a rupee a day a man can feed himself sumptuously in San Francisco, even though he be a bankrupt. Remember this if ever you are stranded in these parts. ~ Rudyard Kipling, 1891

                      Comment


                      • #56
                        Without martial law, and with the military performing ordinary police duties, there were three significant terrorist attempts in a short period; this is not semantics. There is no reason for this raw to stop if no serious measures are taken.
                        Statistical anomaly.
                        The only thing necessary for the triumph of evil is for good men to do nothing.

                        Comment


                        • #57
                          Originally posted by DAVOUT
                          There is no reason for this raw to stop if no serious measures are taken.
                          Are you implying Indian intelligence is involved?
                          "A person cannot approach the divine by reaching beyond the human. To become human, is what this individual person, has been created for.” Martin Buber

                          Comment


                          • #58
                            What are you arguing Davout? What's your point? You can't deliver a punchline for sh!t.
                            I came upon a barroom full of bad Salon pictures in which men with hats on the backs of their heads were wolfing food from a counter. It was the institution of the "free lunch" I had struck. You paid for a drink and got as much as you wanted to eat. For something less than a rupee a day a man can feed himself sumptuously in San Francisco, even though he be a bankrupt. Remember this if ever you are stranded in these parts. ~ Rudyard Kipling, 1891

                            Comment


                            • #59
                              Originally posted by DanS
                              What are you arguing Davout? What's your point? You can't deliver a punchline for sh!t.
                              You said nobody cares whether or not there is a martial law. Terrorists appreciate.
                              The UN blast was made possible by a total absence of security. Terrorists made good use of that.
                              The to-day blast was made without any difficulty, let alone risk, because the holy ground is not accessed at all by the US military. Terrorists ackowledge that respectable attitude.

                              My point is that the US are led to hardening severely the rules currently applied, because the current organization is not designed to eradicate this kind of terrorism. And the democracy will not florish until it is eradicated. The first step is the control of the population which is also named martial law. If for many reasons, legitimate or not, the US dont feel like doing that, they will have to declare it and act accordingly.
                              Statistical anomaly.
                              The only thing necessary for the triumph of evil is for good men to do nothing.

                              Comment


                              • #60
                                Well, Shias didn't want us to be near their holy sites and we complied.

                                It's always the same with people: only after painful experience do they realize their mistake.

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X