Can we kick some real terrorist ass please?

[The diplomat]

Bombing against a UN building in Iraq. A bombing against a bus in Jerusalem.

Innocent people are dying because of these barbaric terrorist monsters.

When are you leftist going to realize that you can't appease, you can't play nice, you can't negotiate? If you try being nice all that happens is more innocent women and children die at the hands of these terrorist monsters.

It's time to get serious folks. Iraq and Afghanistan were a good start, but we are far from done.

IT'S TIME TO GET REAL. IT IS TIME TO BEAT THE CRAP OUT OF THESE TERRORISTS ONCE AND FOR ALL!

[Sava]

nice... it's the liberals fault...

quit listening to Rush, it's making you stupid...

[Jac de Molay]

How does on get rid of something as amorphous as terrorism "once and for all"?

That's like declaring a War on Bad Thoughts or Missing Socks.

[General Ludd]

Where are the pitch forks and torches?

[The diplomat]

Originally posted by Jac de Molay
How does on get rid of something as amorphous as terrorism "once and for all"?

That's like declaring a War on Bad Thoughts or Missing Socks.

terrorist are not ghosts. They are have real training camps, real infrastructure, money, personel, etc...

We cut off the funds, we obliterate the training camps, the kill the terrorist leaders.

[Sava]

short of marching millions of ground troops and conquering the entire Islamic world, terrorism isn't going to go away with military action... killing a few here and there doesn't do much except for create more terrorists. Chickenhawks don't know how to win a war on terror.

[Spiffor]

If you can name the terrorists individually and their exact locations, go ahead. I don't think anybody here is against beating up terrorist's ass. But the thing is, it is not quite as easy to target as some national army.

[rev]

We cut off the funds, we obliterate the training camps, the kill the terrorist leaders.

Let us know when you figure out a way to do that without creating exponentially more terrorists.

[The diplomat]

Originally posted by Sava
nice... it's the liberals fault...

quit listening to Rush, it's making you stupid...

Like the libs are making sense. Just talk to the terrorists and ask them pretty please not to kill people, all the while more innocent civilians are blown to pieces.

[Sava]

Originally posted by Spiffor
If you can name the terrorists individually and their exact locations, go ahead. I don't think anybody here is against beating up terrorist's ass. But the thing is, it is not quite as easy to target as some national army.

no read the first post... liberals and leftists just want to appease Osama bin Laden. In fact, Osama is living at the Democratic Party Headquarters.

[Sirotnikov]

It means that all of you liberal pu**ies need to stop paying heed to totalitarian dictatorships which support, fund and breed terrorism.

America is realizing that it can't stay friends with Saudi Arabia, and have began taking steps and they start getting results (Israeli newspaper says that Saudia secrtly contacted Israel for info about terrorists in Saudia, promising to start taking care of them).

Why can't the euro's realize the same about Syria and Iran?

[Spiffor]

Originally posted by The diplomat
We cut off the funds

Stop buying oil, and half the problem is gone. Make sure the Arabs don't want to support affiliated organizations, and the other half of the problem is gone.

We obliterate the training camps

Where are they ? Will you bring up the bombers if the "training camp" is a house in the middle of a village / city ?

the kill the terrorist leaders.

Better interrogate them first. Again, that supposes that you find them. It's not exactly easy... unless you consider every Arab to be a terrorist leader ?

[Dom Pedro II]

Well, c'mon, dip... You guys had them on the payroll for such a long time, why don't YOU talk to them?

[Spiffor]

Originally posted by Sirotnikov
It means that all of you liberal pu**ies need to stop paying heed to totalitarian dictatorships which support, fund and breed terrorism.

Edit: the first sentence was completely wrong . It is not liberal Euro pussies who paid heed to dictatorships, but geostrategic interests. We pussies only oppose more slaughter, that'll eventually lead to more hatred and more terrorism. We aren't fond of despotisms, no more than conservative blowhards.

America is realizing that it can't stay friends with Saudi Arabia, and have began taking steps and they start getting results (Israeli newspaper says that Saudia secrtly contacted Israel for info about terrorists in Saudia, promising to start taking care of them).

At last, it was about time. Since when did any liberal here said we should appease Saudi ?

Why can't the euro's realize the same about Syria and Iran?

For the time being, Syria and Iran are calm, despite a very bad past wrt terrorism. We don't know everything that's happening behind the scenes, but I wouldn't be surprised that Syria gets some pressure from Europe to maintain the Hezbollah idle. It is another strategy: better have idle terrorist groups under control than wild terrorist groups running galore.

[The diplomat]

Originally posted by Dom Pedro II
Well, c'mon, dip... You guys had them on the payroll for such a long time, why don't YOU talk to them?

Who did we have on our payroll, the Saudis?

Look, I think we should threaten to cut ties with Saudi Arabia. We could try to buy our oil from Russia instead. They have a huge untapped source in Siberia.

We can't be dependant on ME oil. We should do everything possible to eliminate our dependency.

And we should cut ties with countries that aid terrorists. We should be consistent. We shouldn't talk tough about terror and then turn around do business with them.