Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Best Ever Movie - Round Two

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #16
    Well, realizing this is nothing more than a beauty contest, I have voted for the movie I like watching most, which is Shawshank. Not to say that I think it is cinematically superior to Kane, Godfather or Chinatown, only that I like it best.



    Same reason, different movie:

    Braveheart
    Is God willing to prevent evil, but not able? Then he is not omnipotent. Is he able, but not willing? Then he is malevolent. Is he both able and willing? Then whence cometh evil? Is he neither able nor willing?
    Then why call him God? - Epicurus

    Comment


    • #17
      I wouldn't say that about Braveheart, it has everything. Love, passion, friendship, cruelty, war, loyalty, betrayal... Man...

      I saw Godfather for the first time a few months ago. It did not live up to expectations. I thought Goodfellas was a better mob movie, although Al Pacino was good.

      The Matrix? OK, I guess. Boring, I think.

      Shawshank Redemption is good. I cry every time at the end. What a girl.
      If playground rules don't apply, this is anarchy! -Kelso

      Comment


      • #18
        Matrix
        Follow me on Twitter: http://twitter.com/DaveDaDouche
        Read my seldom updated blog where I talk to myself: http://davedadouche.blogspot.com/

        Comment


        • #19
          Vote for Arnie, support next governor of California.
          Attached Files

          Comment


          • #20
            I gotta tell ya, if "Matrix" wins I might not come to Apolyton anymore.

            Otoh, nawwwwwwwww.

            Comment


            • #21
              Some of those choices are ridiculous...

              Citizen Kane? Boring.
              Godfather? Boring.
              Chinatown? Boring.
              Casablanca? Boring.
              Follow me on Twitter: http://twitter.com/DaveDaDouche
              Read my seldom updated blog where I talk to myself: http://davedadouche.blogspot.com/

              Comment


              • #22
                Matrix: Simplistic
                Star Wars: Child-like and possibly the most over-rated piece of shiite since "The 10 Commandments." No, make that "ever."
                Gladiator:
                Fight Club: Deep movie... if you're 13.

                Comment


                • #23
                  David, you don't really know film, do you?

                  Comment


                  • #24
                    I don't care about technical film making, I care about what's enjoyable. If I'm bored by a movie, then the movie sucks, in my opinion.

                    And don't get me started on books that are considered classics, either
                    Follow me on Twitter: http://twitter.com/DaveDaDouche
                    Read my seldom updated blog where I talk to myself: http://davedadouche.blogspot.com/

                    Comment


                    • #25
                      I would hope that film is about what you experience while watching it...
                      If playground rules don't apply, this is anarchy! -Kelso

                      Comment


                      • #26
                        I agree. Watching "The Matrix", for example, gets me into a very philosophical mood, as well as touching on the subject of martial arts. As those are two of my favorite things/subjects, it stands to reason that I consider "Matrix" a great movie.
                        Follow me on Twitter: http://twitter.com/DaveDaDouche
                        Read my seldom updated blog where I talk to myself: http://davedadouche.blogspot.com/

                        Comment


                        • #27
                          Well, "knowing what films you like" is not the same as "knowing about films."

                          Given that for some reason you brought up "classic" books, plus given the fact that you listed the only 4 movies that would logically qualify on a "top 10 American films" list, it seems readily apparent that your problem is not with the films themselves but other peoples' appreciation of them and their (the films and books) elevation to "classic" status.

                          As we used to say in my HS days: WHATever!

                          Comment


                          • #28
                            Well, "knowing what films you like" is not the same as "knowing about films."
                            Granted, but the phrase "Best Ever Movie" to me is asking "Which film do you enjoy the most?".

                            Given that for some reason you brought up "classic" books, plus given the fact that you listed the only 4 movies that would logically qualify on a "top 10 American films" list, it seems readily apparent that your problem is not with the films themselves but other peoples' appreciation of them and their (the films and books) elevation to "classic" status.
                            I have no problem with other people enjoying Casablanca or Catcher in the Rye, I just find both mindnumbingly boring. Therefore, I don't consider Casablanca a good movie, nor do I think Catcher in the Rye is a good book. Or Shakespeare, for that matter.

                            If you enjoy it, great But don't try to tell me that I should think those are great movies/books, because I just don't enjoy them, and to me, the only reason to see a movie or read a work of fiction is for enjoyment.
                            Follow me on Twitter: http://twitter.com/DaveDaDouche
                            Read my seldom updated blog where I talk to myself: http://davedadouche.blogspot.com/

                            Comment


                            • #29
                              Originally posted by JohnT
                              it seems readily apparent that your problem is not with the films themselves but other peoples' appreciation of them
                              Oh, you mean like how people get mad about Titanic?

                              I only read books that are considered classic, although I don't always like them (Will Faulkner). It usually means the writer knows what they were doing or was interesting enough to make a lasting impression on people.

                              There was a a quote about this about Shakespeare. It was something like that he's very good, in spite of the fact that people are always saying he's very good. Hype makes for a big let-down sometimes.
                              If playground rules don't apply, this is anarchy! -Kelso

                              Comment


                              • #30
                                Naw, it's gotta be more than that. Your comment was unprovoked, out of nowhere, obviously meant to antagonize, and, well, "ridiculous."

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X