Just curious 
I've got 307 GB (1 x 250 + 1 x 40 + 1 x 17)... and I could always use some more

I've got 307 GB (1 x 250 + 1 x 40 + 1 x 17)... and I could always use some more

|
GB? I'm counting Terrabyte
|
4.26%
|
2
|
|
500GB+
|
2.13%
|
1
|
|
400GB+
|
2.13%
|
1
|
|
300GB+
|
4.26%
|
2
|
|
200GB+
|
4.26%
|
2
|
|
150GB+
|
0.00%
|
0
|
|
100GB+
|
17.02%
|
8
|
|
50GB+
|
29.79%
|
14
|
|
Less than 50GB
|
34.04%
|
16
|
|
GB? I'm counting Megebyte
|
2.13%
|
1
|
|
I've got 250 BananaBytes
|
0.00%
|
0
|
. Seeing as how close to 90% have below 150 GB, perhaps a different scaling would have been better
.
. Seeing as how close to 90% have below 150 GB, perhaps a different scaling would have been better
.
Comment