Originally posted by Ned
On the same day that HST made the above note, we have this from his the Chief of Staff directing the bombing of Hiroshima or three other cities. None were purely military targets. All involved civilians.
On the same day that HST made the above note, we have this from his the Chief of Staff directing the bombing of Hiroshima or three other cities. None were purely military targets. All involved civilians.
Or are you one of these pansies who figures because an enemy hides his military assets amongst the civilian population, they're automatically exempt?
I guess you'd have to be against every military intervention or attack by the US in the 20th and 21st centuries then.

Give it up, trolls don't work when you contradict your own earlier position.
Guess you'll be voting for Boxer and that porn star who filed for the governor's race then?
Besides, why rag on Truman, who's been dead over 30 years, when you can rag on Bush, who's here now?
So what? It was impossible, by WW2 technology, to authenticate the originator of non-voice communications without use of code words known only to the sending and receiving parties in advance. Apparently, you're so caught up on semantics that it's an unshakeable foundation of your belief system that is someone said "from the emperor" (especially in an informal note a la Truman, who is getting third-hand information), that simply could not mean "supposedly from the emperor" or "from the emperor's office." Japanese documents have shown that the emperor did no more than listen to arguments and suggest to his stuff and the IJGS that they consult among themselves and report back to him, until after the bombs dropped. 
Comment