Originally posted by GePap
Srry, but the only way the Monroe doctrine worked was cause it was also in [bn]British[/b] interests. In 1820 the US could not have stopped any imperial power from taking over SA states, specially Britain. BUt Britian could keep them at bay, which was in Brisith interest cause then they could gain market share. So Latin America owes more to the UK than US until well into the 19th century.
Srry, but the only way the Monroe doctrine worked was cause it was also in [bn]British[/b] interests. In 1820 the US could not have stopped any imperial power from taking over SA states, specially Britain. BUt Britian could keep them at bay, which was in Brisith interest cause then they could gain market share. So Latin America owes more to the UK than US until well into the 19th century.
Even then, the US failed to keep the French adventuresrs out of Mexico, and it was the Mexicans who drove them out.
The US meddled far far less, so the two situations are not compatible. You also ignore European meddling in Latin America and US meddling in Africa after 1945.
Comment