Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Pax Americana

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #76
    Re: Pax Americana

    Originally posted by problem_child
    Is it a good thing or a bad thing that the Project for a New American Century is all about America taking over the world? Do you think that American dominance world wide will make the Earth a better place to live... or is it something to be feared and avoided at all costs.

    I of course have my own strong opinions on the matter, I'm sure you can guess what they are, but I am curious what American people think about their states designs for the futures of all nations (come to think of it I'm curious as to why the US public seems to buy the world-veiw it's fed). I know alot of Americans realy don't care what foreigners think of their country, but is that because they heartily agree with US foreign policy [America First stamp on the rest] or because they honeslty think US foreign policy is essentially benevolent...

    If this thread just gets closed, that'll certainly do as an answer too I suppose. But I'm not just trolling, I really do want to know. In the UK alot of people just turn their brains off with the attitude
    'I'll leave decisions like that [going to war etc] to my betters to decide, far be it for me to second guess the government, they know what they're doing, and they're doing it for our sake' which I think is a pretty negligent attitude for voters in a 'democracy' to take.
    of course it should ber america first?

    who else should america put first, saudi arabia

    but of course, other nations should resist any attempts by the US to rule the world (and the US shouldn't..., but will if all other nations just roll over and bare their throats)

    Jon Miller
    Jon Miller-
    I AM.CANADIAN
    GENERATION 35: The first time you see this, copy it into your sig on any forum and add 1 to the generation. Social experiment.

    Comment


    • #77
      Originally posted by HershOstropoler
      Oerdin:

      You can claim some cause there, but rarely a direct link.
      How about France?

      "A large part of the reason all of Latin America" - What exactly did the US do to promote democracy there?
      We kept you out. While Europe was quickly gobbling up most of Asia and Africa, The US provided a shield against European colonialsm in Latin America. Simon Bolivar tried to model South America on the United States.

      In any case, what has YOUR country done to promote democracy?

      Comment


      • #78
        BTW just so there is no misunderstanding. They people Sava is so upset about "set up" the think tank. The people who actually run it are as follows:

        Project Directors
        William Kristol, Chairman
        Robert Kagan
        Bruce P. Jackson
        Lewis E. Lehrman
        Mark Gerson
        Randy Scheunemann

        Project Staff
        Gary Schmitt, Executive Director
        Daniel McKivergan, Deputy Director
        Ellen Bork, Deputy Director
        Thomas Donnelly, Senior Fellow
        Reuel Marc Gerecht, Senior Fellow, Director of the Middle East Initiative
        Christopher Maletz, Assistant Director


        If you don't recognize any of these people from teh current administration don't be suprised (unless you are Sava).

        Comment


        • #79
          gunkulator:

          "How about France?"

          No issue about Europe and Japan in/post WWII. The issue is the 3rd world.

          "We kept you out. While Europe was quickly gobbling up most of Asia and Africa, The US provided a shield against European colonialsm in Latin America. Simon Bolivar tried to model South America on the United States."

          Whom did you keep out? The spanish (and portuguese, though under different circumstances) had just lost it, and few powers had an appetite to redo the 20 year wars of independence that the spanish lost. Also, had the brits wanted a piece of it, you would have been barely in a position to stop them.

          "In any case, what has YOUR country done to promote democracy?"

          What has my country done to prop up dictators, apart from exporting a guy to become one in Germany? After 1918 it was simply too small to do much either way. Before that... well, what has the US to show? The 1917 intervention against constitutional monarchies on behalf of a bunch of colonial powers that held several 100 million people under colonial yoke?
          “Now we declare… that the law-making power or the first and real effective source of law is the people or the body of citizens or the prevailing part of the people according to its election or its will expressed in general convention by vote, commanding or deciding that something be done or omitted in regard to human civil acts under penalty or temporal punishment….” (Marsilius of Padua, „Defensor Pacis“, AD 1324)

          Comment


          • #80
            Originally posted by gunkulator
            In any case, what has YOUR country done to promote democracy?
            What a loaded question.

            He hides behind that Europa banner, but he's from Austria, long a bastion of freedom and democracy!
            I believe Saddam because his position is backed up by logic and reason...David Floyd
            i'm an ignorant greek...MarkG

            Comment


            • #81
              Originally posted by HershOstropoler

              As an old german proverb says: "Können vor Lachen."
              you also had some other ones to the tune of "Deustchland über alles", "arbiet macht frei", and "ein volk. ein reich. ein fuhrer".
              "I've lived too long with pain. I won't know who I am without it. We have to leave this place, I am almost happy here."
              - Ender, from Ender's Game by Orson Scott Card

              Comment


              • #82
                Now now, Hitler was leading Germany at the time, he was only born in Austria, let's be real.
                I believe Saddam because his position is backed up by logic and reason...David Floyd
                i'm an ignorant greek...MarkG

                Comment


                • #83
                  Nope, we had "Gott erhalte Franz den Kaiser...."
                  “Now we declare… that the law-making power or the first and real effective source of law is the people or the body of citizens or the prevailing part of the people according to its election or its will expressed in general convention by vote, commanding or deciding that something be done or omitted in regard to human civil acts under penalty or temporal punishment….” (Marsilius of Padua, „Defensor Pacis“, AD 1324)

                  Comment


                  • #84
                    Originally posted by Meldor
                    BTW just so there is no misunderstanding. They people Sava is so upset about "set up" the think tank. The people who actually run it are as follows:

                    Project Directors
                    William Kristol, Chairman
                    Robert Kagan
                    Bruce P. Jackson
                    Lewis E. Lehrman
                    Mark Gerson
                    Randy Scheunemann

                    Project Staff
                    Gary Schmitt, Executive Director
                    Daniel McKivergan, Deputy Director
                    Ellen Bork, Deputy Director
                    Thomas Donnelly, Senior Fellow
                    Reuel Marc Gerecht, Senior Fellow, Director of the Middle East Initiative
                    Christopher Maletz, Assistant Director


                    If you don't recognize any of these people from teh current administration don't be suprised (unless you are Sava).
                    Does it suck being wrong?
                    PNAC was founded in 1997 and is headed by project directors William
                    Kristol, editor of the Weekly Standard, Robert Kagan, senior associate
                    at the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace, contributing editor
                    at the Weekly Standard and columnist for the Washington Post, and
                    Bruce Jackson, a long-time Lockheed Martin executive who recently left
                    the corporation to work full time on military policy issues. Its
                    statement of principles recalls "the Reagan Administration's success"
                    and urges a return to a "military that is strong and ready to meet
                    both present and future challenges." PNAC's founding document was
                    signed by Paul Wolfowitz, **** Cheney, Donald Rumsfeld and numerous
                    others who have gone on to become major players in the Bush national
                    security team. Defense contractor Lockheed Martin recently hired
                    PNAC's deputy director and principal author of the report, Thomas
                    Donnelly


                    The Military-Industrial-Think Tank Complex
                    Corporate Think Tanks and the
                    Doctrine of Aggressive Militarism

                    By William Hartung and Michelle Ciarrocca
                    To us, it is the BEAST.

                    Comment


                    • #85
                      Originally posted by Chris 62
                      Now now, Hitler was leading Germany at the time, he was only born in Austria, let's be real.


                      nearly all of europe was german at one time or another
                      "I've lived too long with pain. I won't know who I am without it. We have to leave this place, I am almost happy here."
                      - Ender, from Ender's Game by Orson Scott Card

                      Comment


                      • #86
                        There are many nations, [over 70] that have been subjected to this kind of thing, which is why I just can't seem to shut-up about it, no argument justifies it, you can't wash it into being in anyway moral or good, it's just capitalist-agenda power-freakery, so I really don't get how the sponsor of this is somehow transformed into the nation that loves freedom and democracy.
                        during the cold war, it was either those nations were a bastradly capitalist country, or a bastardly communist. If we didint support them, the soviets would have and they would have become communist... which means another closed market. So we had a choice. Support the bastards adn be friends, or not support them and be enemies... most of those basards would have been there either way. you cant blame the US on that fact, no matter how hard you try
                        "I bet Ikarus eats his own spunk..."
                        - BLACKENED from America's Army: Operations
                        Kramerman - Creator and Author of The Epic Tale of Navalon in the Civ III Stories Forum

                        Comment


                        • #87
                          Originally posted by Uber KruX nearly all of europe was german at one time or another
                          It might interest you to know Austria was a dictatorship under Kurt von Schuschnigg before Hitler took over.

                          Ol Kurt never met an election he liked (or didn't try to rig).
                          I believe Saddam because his position is backed up by logic and reason...David Floyd
                          i'm an ignorant greek...MarkG

                          Comment


                          • #88
                            Ol Kurt never met an election he liked (or didn't try to rig).
                            Sounds like he'd be perfect for the Bush/Cheney 2004 campaign.
                            To us, it is the BEAST.

                            Comment


                            • #89
                              Originally posted by Uber KruX


                              you also had some other ones to the tune of "Deustchland über alles", "arbiet macht frei", and "ein volk. ein reich. ein fuhrer".


                              *wipes tears from eyes*

                              that was good uber. i guess it just caught me by suprise
                              "I bet Ikarus eats his own spunk..."
                              - BLACKENED from America's Army: Operations
                              Kramerman - Creator and Author of The Epic Tale of Navalon in the Civ III Stories Forum

                              Comment


                              • #90
                                Originally posted by HershOstropoler
                                Whom did you keep out? The spanish (and portuguese, though under different circumstances) had just lost it, and few powers had an appetite to redo the 20 year wars of independence that the spanish lost. Also, had the brits wanted a piece of it, you would have been barely in a position to stop them.
                                Sure, but we made it clear that we'd put up a fight. So instead of colonizing South America, the Brits picked on the relatively easier Africans. Without the United States, Latin America would have been just more easy pickings for the Brits.


                                What has my country done to prop up dictators, apart from exporting a guy to become one in Germany?
                                kinda a big one there...

                                After 1918 it was simply too small to do much either way. Before that... well, what has the US to show? The 1917 intervention against constitutional monarchies on behalf of a bunch of colonial powers that held several 100 million people under colonial yoke?
                                Actually, America's greatest gift to the world may have been our LACK of action in WWI. Instead of rushing in to support one imperialistic power or the other, we let you guys foolishly spend all your money and power beating each other up. Helped put an end to Europe's monarchies.

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X