Breaking News: Saddam's two sons are killed by US Special Forces.

[CorpusScorpius]

Originally posted by BeBro


Why not? If only half of the rumours about their crimes are true, they could make a trial quite easily. Plus, I think it would be important for the Iraqi public.

So these two are only half bad I do agree w/ U that for the Iraqi people it would have been important .

[BeBMan]

Originally posted by CorpusScorpius


So these two are only half bad

Errmm - is my English really that bad?

[Immortal Wombat]

no

[BeBMan]

[Berzerker]

Couldn't happen to a nicer couple of guys. I on their graves!

[Sprayber]

Originally posted by BeBro


Errmm - is my English really that bad?

I understood what you said

[CorpusScorpius]

Originally posted by BeBro


Errmm - is my English really that bad?

No your english isn't that bad. The deceased were not known for their charity. That is why they would not receive a FAIR trial.

[BeBMan]

NM

[Nubclear]

if true, though a lifetime of torture would have been better for these *******.......

[JCG]

Better to have caught them alive and start a trial against them, but well...you can't have everything. Still, it's something good for both Americans and the people of Iraq.

[GePap]

Well, the military seems very sure of themselves (unlike all the other times they have been positively killed), os that is good news.

NOw, wil it lower the number of attacks on Americans? now that is the 64k dollar question, no? If not, then we have issues, cause our theory of what is happening in Iraq would be wrong.

[Pekka]

GePap, I don't know the structure of command in Iraqi resistance.. I don't know, maybe there are strong leaders and personalities, that the men are respecting and continue fighting for them. I don't know.. but without strong leader(s) they won't go for long. However, I suspect that they have few.

[GePap]

Originally posted by Pekka
GePap, I don't know the structure of command in Iraqi resistance.. I don't know, maybe there are strong leaders and personalities, that the men are respecting and continue fighting for them. I don't know.. but without strong leader(s) they won't go for long. However, I suspect that they have few.

Yes Pekka, but this assumption is based on following the Pentagon notion that all the resistance is made up of Baathist leftovers, so get rid of the top Baathists, and Ta da. Which is why the change in level and types of attacks on Americans now after this is crucial to see. If no significant change occurs, or if levels creep up instead of dow, then the annalysis that it is all Baathist doings may be wrong.

[Pekka]

I don't mean to sound like a butthole, but my trust for pentagon information is kind of low. I take it as a guidance, but not as truth .

Cutting of the head might not kill the body. If there are experienced leaders, they might be also motivated to continue, as they face something nasty if they surrender, and if they are able to continue, they can fantasize about being the top guys for future Iraq, when invaders have been toppled.

I mean, Iraqi leaders could have never expected to last the US attacks. This is what they wanted, this is what it has come down.. now I wouldn't count on it to stop when these guys falled today. Maybe it slows down for a while, maybe they need a little regrouping and organizing. Again, this is only my opinion and speculating.

[Zero]

more death and carnage on news is always good news!

especially if you can publically show your excitement in this case!