Oh Susie Q, baby I love you

[Cruddy]

This is what ONTOS looked like for when you get back;-



Have no idea why it wasn't successful - perhaps you should look into it?

[Pekka]

Not yet sleeping. That's ONTOS? I didn't know what they called those.. thanks for that one. I'm more educated now. I don't know why these aren't succesful.. They look pretty good. I think the basic idea seems to be pretty good in that one..

Maybe I should find info why that was a failure. But that's certainly different from my design, as mine purely is based on fire power, very fast rapid fire and mobility. It should be as fast as hmmv's.

But as of now, I have no idea why that design is a failure.

[Pekka]

PH, what is so weird about this thread?

edit: and now it's sleepy time. Keep busy, I'll be back tomorrow.

[General Ludd]

Originally posted by Pekka
PH, what is so weird about this thread?

You mean aside from you geting horny over killing machines?

[Provost Harrison]

Osweld has summed it up...it is weird. Get excited by cars or aircraft or stamps or postcards, but weaponry, it all seems a bit unpleasant...the enjoyment of pieces of equipment that can cause death on a huge scale...not my idea of pleasant.

[Zopperoni]

Originally posted by Pekka
The idea is to have closer to 60 tubes able to shoot granades and/or chemical agents. It is highly mobile, light vehicle.

With so many guns on all sides of the vehicle and so much recoil from the grenade-firing, won't it just end up standing still during combat?

[Provost Harrison]

My question is: where exactly will it carry all this ammunition

[Zopperoni]

Originally posted by Provost Harrison
My question is: where exactly will it carry all this ammunition

In a special trailer?

[Provost Harrison]

Looking at the thing, if downsized a bit, it could double as a cash register

[mrmitchell]

be afraid, be very afraid

NOT a concept drawing, the actual thing here

[Pekka]

Of course you can't drive at full speed and use all the tubes. And it's not very small vehicle now is it. It is light, not tiny, small. Besides the recoil is not that bad.
And the tubes are computerized, it's not like you are supposed to use ALL the tubes at the same time at every situation. That way you just run out of ammo in one minute or something.

And I think there is difference between getting sexually excited and just excited, don't you think?

[Provost Harrison]

Well here is my artistic contribution to this thread

[RGBVideo]

That Pekka's original picture... that original picture... Sheesh.

With so many guns on all sides of the vehicle and so much recoil from the grenade-firing, won't it just end up standing still during combat?

Don't equip it with engines, but put all of the tubes to one direction, then fire grenades with 10 rpm each, then it'll be ingenious for panic retreating purposes!

[Pekka]

PH, if you want to design your own stuff, what ever it may be, then feel free to make a new thread. If not, then please stay on topic. No one said that other designs are not welcome, but they are not welcome. If you want to make modifications to the original model, then they are appreciated, but if you have nothing to contribute, then why not just STFU?

[Pekka]

Tuome, I have already explained that problem in earlier post, the recoil and all. It's not a problem, as there is not much recoil to begin with.