Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Rivisionist History indeed!

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #46
    Originally posted by Fez


    You don't me.

    The Times is the biggest bull****ers to exist... read the book that was written about them and how they were hijacked by ultra-leftists.
    You mean this G.W. Bush's best seller?
    quote: ""You f*cking son of a b!tch. I saw what you wrote. We're not going to forget this."
    -George W. Bush to writer and editor Al Hunt, 1988
    Attached Files

    Comment


    • #47
      Originally posted by Kidicious
      Where do you get that stuff Serb?
      From "My downloads" folder.

      Comment


      • #48
        Serb Funny a55 stuff

        Comment


        • #49
          Another one then:
          Attached Files

          Comment


          • #50
            1. to all those people who think that iraq won't have these weapons:
            they'll find them, sooner or later. maybe tomorrow, maybe thirty years from now.
            the liberal poster boy clinton said the same thing bush did, in regards to iraq and its hankering for wmd.

            2. to all the republicans and conservatives who are now saying that wmd was never a major part of the war and trying to spin it towards liberation: it's not the others revising history, it's you. granted, wolfowitz does not speak for the administration officially, but since his voice is a powerful one, his thoughts on the matter would have quite a bit of weight:
            "For bureaucratic reasons, we settled on one issue, weapons of mass destruction (as justification for invading Iraq) because it was the one reason everyone could agree on." (28 May 2003). that was the case made to the public: that the wmd he possessed posed a very real threat to america. this idea about liberation did not get much airtime until recently.

            and gepap is right: this was never about liberation, or oil, or wmd. it was to make a base from which the united states can project its power into the arab world to better defend itself in the future.
            B♭3

            Comment


            • #51
              the one with the pope........
              urgh.NSFW

              Comment


              • #52
                *rolls the eyes*

                Now if only we could live in a communist utopia where we would all be poor together.

                Comment


                • #53
                  Originally posted by Q Cubed
                  1. to all those people who think that iraq won't have these weapons:
                  they'll find them, sooner or later. maybe tomorrow, maybe thirty years from now.
                  Sure, very soon they'll find them.
                  Attached Files

                  Comment


                  • #54
                    Originally posted by Q Cubed
                    and gepap is right: this was never about liberation, or oil, or wmd. it was to make a base from which the united states can project its power into the arab world to better defend itself in the future.
                    Nah...this war was a family showdowns. This evil freak wanted to hurt George's daddy...
                    Attached Files

                    Comment


                    • #55
                      Sure, very soon they'll find them.

                      i'm willing to give bush and blair the benefit of the doubt.
                      blair is quite adamant about it, and that makes me unwilling to toss the notion of hidden wmd out the window.

                      i do, however, think that the case for wmd was overblown and overfocused. i find myself tending to agree with thomas friedman:
                      [I]t is a disturbing thought that the Bush team could get itself so tied up defending its phony reasons for going to war — the notion that Saddam possessed weapons of mass destruction that were undeterrable and could threaten us, or that he had links with Al Qaeda — that it could get distracted from fulfilling the real and valid reason for the war: to install a decent, tolerant, pluralistic, multireligious government in Iraq that would be the best answer and antidote to both Saddam and Osama....

                      Eyes on the prize, please. If we find W.M.D. in Iraq, but lose Iraq, Mr. Bush will not only go down as a failed president, but one who made the world even more dangerous for Americans. If we find no W.M.D., but build a better Iraq — one that proves that a multiethnic, multireligious Arab state can rule itself in a decent way — Mr. Bush will survive his hyping of the W.M.D. issue, and the world will be a more hospitable and safer place for all Americans.
                      B♭3

                      Comment


                      • #56
                        Nah...this war was a family showdowns. This evil freak wanted to hurt George's daddy...

                        no, no, it wasn't.
                        it was about power. nothing more, nothing less.
                        B♭3

                        Comment


                        • #57
                          Originally posted by DarthVeda
                          *rolls the eyes*

                          Now if only we could live in a communist utopia where we would all be poor together.
                          Don't worry. Soon you will be.
                          Attached Files

                          Comment


                          • #58
                            Originally posted by Q Cubed
                            no, no, it wasn't.
                            it was about power. nothing more, nothing less.
                            Sure...
                            Do you remember this song?
                            Power is the money, money is the power
                            minute after minute, hour after hour...

                            It calls gangster's paradise.
                            Attached Files

                            Comment


                            • #59
                              why are people complaining that Bush is a liar?

                              Clinton was a liar too, and no one found a problem with that.

                              In fact, this is all Clinton's fault. Clinton made it okay for a president to lie, now everyone is doing it.

                              Comment


                              • #60
                                How dare you?
                                Such romantic person as Clinton can't lie.
                                Attached Files

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X