Madison IA64 Released -- Fastest CPU Ever

[Asher]

Re: Re: Re: Re: Reeding shur is harrd

Originally posted by panag
look at the future , its G5 now , ....

link , so you dont know apples site , ....

allas at your special request >>> www.apple.com

The G5 has zero L3 cache, according to Apple! How long are you going to play this game?

and you are sure about your calculations , ..... no way they are going to beat 999mb , ..... so one of the two is wrong , and huh , under what OS , ....

have a nice day

Huh?? Even the 32-bit Windows allows 2GB RAM/2GB virtual per process.

panag, you seriously don't have a clue what you're talking about. Stop trying.

[Panag]

Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Reeding shur is harrd

Originally posted by Asher

The G5 has zero L3 cache, according to Apple! How long are you going to play this game?


Huh?? Even the 32-bit Windows allows 2GB RAM/2GB virtual per process.

panag, you seriously don't have a clue what you're talking about. Stop trying.

hi ,

have you even visited apple's site and looked at the specs and options , .....

cause if you would have , .....

i dave a clue , do you , ..... there is your answer , its the same as your answer would be , .....

have a nice day

[Asher]

http://developer.apple.com/technotes/tn/tn2087.html

http://developer.apple.com/technotes/tn/tn2087.html

http://developer.apple.com/technotes/tn/tn2087.html

http://developer.apple.com/technotes/tn/tn2087.html

http://developer.apple.com/technotes/tn/tn2087.html

http://developer.apple.com/technotes/tn/tn2087.html

[Wiglaf]

Asher, no one uses computers for Photoshop, or at least no one needs excessive speed for it. I will come out and say it: who gives a crap about pictures and image editing. Faster processors are a waste of my time. Macs are really good for stability, coolness without having to pay extra for a nice third party case, and uh - plug and play, essentially painless airport wireless. You cannot beat that.

And btw macs have 512 cache and you only have a 3 cache - case closed.

[Asher]

panag, since you apparently can't even figure out how to click links, I took the liberty of taking a screenshot and highlighting the important part:

Wiglaf:
Apple's been behind in that department, too. Intel's been on 512KB for the desktop chips for a LONG time, and a month after the G5 comes out, both AMD and Intel are using 1024KB L2 cache.

[Panag]

Originally posted by Asher

http://developer.apple.com/technotes/tn/tn2087.html

http://developer.apple.com/technotes/tn/tn2087.html

http://developer.apple.com/technotes/tn/tn2087.html

http://developer.apple.com/technotes/tn/tn2087.html

http://developer.apple.com/technotes/tn/tn2087.html

http://developer.apple.com/technotes/tn/tn2087.html

hi ,

well the folks at apple are going to love it that you post the same link so often , ....

have you bothered to read the other pages also , ....

ten min ago you where asking for a link , ......

and now you post one , .......

its still 8 gig of ram , ..... as to six , .....

have a nice night

[Asher]

Originally posted by panag
its still 8 gig of ram , ..... as to six , .....

Jesus Christ man, where do you get 6GB of RAM?

The article clearly says that particular model can address 24GB, which is limited only because of the physical space inside the chassis.

Have you been right about anything?

[Panag]

Originally posted by Asher
panag, since you apparently can't even figure out how to click links, I took the liberty of taking a screenshot and highlighting the important part:

Wiglaf:
Apple's been behind in that department, too. Intel's been on 512KB for the desktop chips for a LONG time, and a month after the G5 comes out, both AMD and Intel are using 1024KB L2 cache.

hi ,

but who is talking about the level , you are , .....

the difference still is eight to six , read the post again , nowhere did i start to speak about L2 or L3 or L25 or L99 for that matter , ....



have a great one

[Asher]

Originally posted by panag
hi ,

but who is talking about the level , you are , .....

the difference still is eight to six , read the post again , nowhere did i start to speak about L2 or L3 or L25 or L99 for that matter , ....


have a great one

Oh my GOD.


You can't be serious...

Your IQ is in the single digits. If that.

[Asher]

Just because you still don't get it. From the article in the very first post:

The workhorse can address 24GB of DDR memory, and supports AGP graphics including the Radeon 7000 and the Quadro 2EX.

[Panag]

Originally posted by Asher

Oh my GOD.


You can't be serious...

Your IQ is in the single digits. If that.

hi ,

and btw , look again as to what you have posted earlier , .....

and no matter what you say , or anyone else , panag is going to have a huge party when that comp with 8gig of ddr arrives , ......

have a nice night my friend

[Asher]

Originally posted by panag
hi ,

and btw , look again as to what you have posted earlier , .....

and no matter what you say , or anyone else , panag is going to have a huge party when that comp with 8gig of ddr arrives , ......

have a nice night my friend

But OS X 10.3 can only see 2GB of it.

Oh well, have fun at your party. I hope some of your guests are smart enough to get amusement out of you.

[Panag]

Originally posted by Asher
Just because you still don't get it. From the article in the very first post:

hi ,

might all be well , but when is that in the store , ..... when , ......

as long as it aint commercially of the shelf it does no-one good , .....

it has to be build in a comp with an OS , .....

and by the time it does , there shall be a new mac comp aswell , ......

have a nice day

[Wiglaf]

What have you done?!

Asher, for the love of god, read the man's location field. We've been keeping it cool for years but now we must live in terror yet again.

[Wraith]

Define fastest, Asher. IBM just put out scores for one of their 32 core Power4 machines beat the 64 processor Itanium II.

It's all going to come down to what you're trying to do, what code you've already got, and what resources you have to spend on new code.

--" I fail to see any serious competition beside AMD's Opteron."

Different markets. Opteron is going to do a lot to keep the Itanium out of the workstation space, but they're mostly targeted for different areas of the server market.
Although IBMs cluster-focused rack-mount Opteron server might help push it up there.

--" but the Opteron can only work in systems with up to 8 CPU"

Oh, Asher, you know better than that. It can work in up to 8-way configurations without extra glue logic. Your precious Itanium needs the extra glue logic if you want to do more than one processor at a time. There are already 32-way Opteron servers announced, and they are going to scale far better than the Xeon line (and even the Itaniums).

--"they're small-time Texas companies). "

Like IBM, you mean?

--"Opteron also can only address 16GB of data"

You're wrong about that one, actually. There's a difference between what the Opteron can address and what current memory modules can provide on current motherboards. The CPU itself can address 4.5TB of physical memory.

--"Asher, no one uses computers for Photoshop, or at least no one needs excessive speed for it."

Well, I don't use Photoshop, but I'd never pass up more CPU power to put behind the batch image editing processes I do run with The Gimp...

Wraith
I'm really quite pleasant until I'm awake