Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

If there's no WMD, Bush loses my vote.

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #76
    bush isn't getting my vote. iraq is merely the latest in a string of missteps, i feel, that this administration has had in dealing with the rest of the world.

    that, and a lot of what bush said to make himself look moderate during the election... didn't pan out. the uniter, not divider part? he's polarized the populace, which is a bad thing. the humble nation that gain's the world's respect? under his command, the us hasn't appeared humble at all, but arrogant.

    for bush to save face--and his ass, wmds must be found. he needs to do this quickly, imho. i too think that they did exist; what's evident now, however, is that all of bush's "secret intelligence" was worth jack ****.

    as i understand it, from what i've read, the the information was spun before it reached bush... who spun it further before he released it to us. the spin wasn't done by the cia.
    B♭3

    Comment


    • #77
      Elden, silly idiot statements like that make me realize that even if we do find the stuff the moron leftist majority will reject the truth.

      Don't you realize that if the stuff was going to be planted it would have been by now? Blair and Bush have been catching hell from people over this.

      You keep your head right up your ass if you want to revel in your own ****.
      Long time member @ Apolyton
      Civilization player since the dawn of time

      Comment


      • #78
        Originally posted by Lancer
        Don't you realize that if the stuff was going to be planted it would have been by now? Blair and Bush have been catching hell from people over this.
        No, they wait till ellection time to gain support. They'll be "found" a few days before ellection.
        Last edited by Elden; June 14, 2003, 08:29.
        Unfairly Banned at Civfanatics twice...
        To protest the war I am using the UN Flag - Howard has said most Australians are for the war so clearly I am not an Aussie.

        Comment


        • #79
          They did have WMDs for sure.
          When?

          If there were WMD's in the start of the war in the posession of Iraq, why didn't they use them?

          EDIT: Wait, wait, wait... Anthrax is officially defined as a WMD? Weapons of mass destruction? Where is this world going to?

          Comment


          • #80
            Originally posted by Tuomerehu
            When?

            If there were WMD's in the start of the war in the posession of Iraq, why didn't they use them?
            Because they didn't have them, if they did Washington would be rubble (or they would have attempted to use one in Wahington.).
            Unfairly Banned at Civfanatics twice...
            To protest the war I am using the UN Flag - Howard has said most Australians are for the war so clearly I am not an Aussie.

            Comment

            Working...
            X