I once skimmed a Critical Theory textbook that argued that all critical appraisal that we subject art to could be reduced to three doctrines: complexity, unity and intensity. Sure, we might disagree on what aspects of an artwork carry each quality and to what extent, but we can all (I think) quite easily comprehend both that each of these properties is a good thing, and why this is so. Any disagreement that will arise will be because someone finds one of the qualities lacking whereas another does not, not because he thinks the doctrine of that quality is bollocks.
That way, although you might disagree with me that Figure Skating is shallow, you will agree that depth, taken as totally distinct from other considerations, is a good thing.
That way, although you might disagree with me that Figure Skating is shallow, you will agree that depth, taken as totally distinct from other considerations, is a good thing.
Comment