Now I know this will go against the times we live in but dont you admit that some of the civs that were included were done purely for PC reasons instead of what civs were actually more deserving than the other?
I'm thinking the Iroquios and Zulu in particular.
Can anyone sane argue that the Iroquois are MORE deserving than the Dutch or Portugese?
Of course I see the necessity for non Euro civs like Hebrews, Indians, Chinese, Arabs, and so on. If you're worthy you should be in. Period. Doesn't matter if youre Euro or not.
However that being said, if this game was solely going after which civilizations were most worthy, surely the Iroquois, Zula and some of the others would be out and the Dutch and Portugese in.
So here's the question: In all honesty, don't you guys feel that SOME of the civs that were put in the game were done purely for PC reasons rather than historical importance??
Look foward to intelligent responses. Thanks.
I'm thinking the Iroquios and Zulu in particular.
Can anyone sane argue that the Iroquois are MORE deserving than the Dutch or Portugese?
Of course I see the necessity for non Euro civs like Hebrews, Indians, Chinese, Arabs, and so on. If you're worthy you should be in. Period. Doesn't matter if youre Euro or not.
However that being said, if this game was solely going after which civilizations were most worthy, surely the Iroquois, Zula and some of the others would be out and the Dutch and Portugese in.
So here's the question: In all honesty, don't you guys feel that SOME of the civs that were put in the game were done purely for PC reasons rather than historical importance??
Look foward to intelligent responses. Thanks.
Comment