Neutron Bombs

[Serb]

Originally posted by Azazel
maybe Russia should invest less in ICBMs and more in math lessons for it's kids.

Ok...ok..it was pretty funny. I admit. My only exucse is that I was very drunk (like I'm right now) and typed it in hurry....blyat I'm realy don't know how that type of sh!t coulf happend.

[Serb]

Originally posted by Kramerman


USA! USA! USA!

The same amount of Russian nukes is more then enough to destroy USA. Yeah... keep laughting.

[Serb]

Originally posted by panag


hi ,

they ought to learn russian also

Yeah...you tells this to me.

some russians cant read the russian thats posted at www.topol.ru

Azazel, please tell to him that this site has no connection to Russian ICBMs "Topol"
Panag,

or at www.armscontrol.ru , ......

And what exactly do you mean? Please put a couplr of quotes from this site to make your position more clear.

not to mention they should be thought the meaning of the word "internet search machine"

I see you know how to use it. I bet you gain all your knowledge from it.

furthermore , nah , its not worth it , ....

Coward. You still don't answered a single question from my previous post.

have a nice day

Yeah, and have a good night.

[Serb]

Originally posted by Cruddy


And it's not going to happen with the 2nd strike capabilities of Europe and Israel. Putting missies onto subs kind of removes this option, doesn't it?

Why it removes this option? I didn't say that Europe's second strike wouldn't harm Russia. I just said that 10% of our Satans is enough to wipe-out life from Europe.

Despite how much you seem to enjoy the prospect of a nuclear holocaust.

It wasn't me who started it. or it was I?

All currently deployed anti-missile systems are limited to the intercept limit specified in the ABM treaty from the 70s.

What kind of threaty are you talking about? Yanks broken this agreement not so long ago. We're fell free to create our new AB defense. S-300 already has limited anti-ICBM capabilities. It could shot down all aircrafts/cruise missiles within 150 Km range and ICBMs within 40Km range. So, we already ahve something that Yanks only trying to create right now (using S-300 technology btw, they ""bought" (thanks to our local motherf*ckers", as for me I call it thievery) S-300 from on of the Ukrainian firms not so long ago.

I suspect the majority of such shielding has been done with the idea of protecting against nearby detonations, not deliberate targetting of the individual unit. Complete hardening against such deliberate targetting is almost impossible - too many variables (HOW big is the nuke, HOW close does it detonate, atmospheric conditions, etc etc - all without a single field test).

Absolutely agreed. And I never said otherwise. All I said that our eqipment is resistant to EMP, not that's invulnerable to EMP. And my second point was that to make our equipment less resistant we actally should re-design it and make it more expensive, not more chaep as Panag believe.
And btw, such things as resistance to EMP could be pretty well calculated. We still have a national standart for such thing as resistance EMP on our rail roads. In my university diplom project entire chapter was dedicated to protection from EMP.

As far as being 30 years behind in satellite launch tec, all I can say is the Israelis are not competing for a slice of the commercial market. They are just developing for their own needs. As such, any comparison is futile and childish.

IK don't know dude, first Azazel started poll about Neutron bombs, then Panag started his speeeches about Israelis ICBMs...I'm telling you, they are planning something.

[Panag]

double post

[Panag]

Originally posted by panag



hi ,

why on earth would i put quotes from a site if you can read it yourself , ....

as for topol , you should look around , ..... anyone can find it , .....

plenty of points in there , or are you a coward and dont go there , .... for some such language is a persoanl insult , be carefull to call people a coward , .....

as for the yanks , where would you be today if the us of a would not spend its taxpayers dollars on the ailling soviet and other ex states , ......

or you did not know about that one neither , .....

have a nice day