Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Which country is worse?

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #46
    Originally posted by Oerdin
    Ranskaldan: You must admite that everything I have said about communist China (vs Taiwan) has been completely factual. I have not made up a single thing.
    If we take out UR's use of "millions", then everything he said has been as factual as yours.

    Of course, what happened was that he expanded these facts on purpose so that they seemed like the ONLY things America manages to do - that's why it's called generalizations. The same goes for all your statements.
    Poor silly humans. A temporarily stable pattern of matter and energy stumbles upon self-cognizance for a moment, and suddenly it thinks the whole universe was created for its benefit. -- mbelleroff

    Comment


    • #47
      Oh, I don't know. Is this the same as the one that has millions of shootings a year, slaps funny labels on other countries, invades other countries willy-nilly, props up blood-thirsty dictators, profiles miniorities at home, ignores international laws, spies on everybody else, violates the Geneva Convention blatantly, got a president who snotted coke, evaded personal responsibilities, and stole an election, and has the biggest military budget in the world? Did I mention they have nuclear, biological and chemical weapons, and refused to ban landmines?
      Taking out the millions of shooting thing we still have "invades other countries willy-nilly" which is patiently untrue. Props up blood thirsty dictators hasn't happened since the end of the cold war (though this depends on the definition of blood thirsty dictator) and even then it was only to fight the Soviets. Ignores international laws is verifiably untrue at least as far as the Iraq incidient he constinently harps on as is violating the Geneva convention (even the red cross signed off on Gitmo). Lastly, can you please show me one itty-bitty peace of reputable evidience that Bush ever did coke?

      Case closed. You lose.
      Try http://wordforge.net/index.php for discussion and debate.

      Comment


      • #48


        Nice try.

        I see that you do not dispute the factual side of most of UR's statements - only the justifications behind them. For example - America invades countries, but not "willy-nilly". America props up dictators - for self-protection reasons. America violates Geneva - but wait, it doesn't because the Red Cross hasn't dared to say anything. And as for Bush doing coke - yah whatever, I'll let you guys sort out the fine points of Bush's personal life.

        Well if then, that's just too easy. You don't think China did all those things for fun do you? There are reasons and justifications behind those too. We can spend the rest of the week arguing about those if you want.
        Poor silly humans. A temporarily stable pattern of matter and energy stumbles upon self-cognizance for a moment, and suddenly it thinks the whole universe was created for its benefit. -- mbelleroff

        Comment


        • #49
          Let's see.

          Millions of forced abortions per year, they run over peaceful protesters with tanks, you can be executed for starting your own political party, all reporters must agree to have state censors review their work, and they just happen to have the fastest growing military budget of any major state. Did I mention they have nukes?
          Millions of abortions - yah, as if the alternative (overcrowding and societal collapse) happens to be better.
          Runs over peaceful protestors - It happened once. Most other countries have done similar things. And the justification here is continued societal stability. Call me evil - I consider this to be on an equal moral level as supporting bloody dictatorships against the Soviets, whatever that moral level is.
          All reporters must agree to etc etc - Most countries have censorship to some degree. In fact, most sources of media probably impose selfcensorship in order to avoid offending its viewers. For example, if you try to praise America on the Chinese media, you would be hounded by your viewers, not your government.
          Fastest growing military budget - we need to defend ourselves against belligerents too
          Nukes - look who's talking.

          there we go. I have applied the same methods on your arguments as you have on UR's. Have fun.
          Last edited by ranskaldan; May 2, 2003, 23:58.
          Poor silly humans. A temporarily stable pattern of matter and energy stumbles upon self-cognizance for a moment, and suddenly it thinks the whole universe was created for its benefit. -- mbelleroff

          Comment


          • #50
            Originally posted by Oerdin
            Face it UR. You live in an extrodinarially repressive country which is run by a regime who wouldn't bat an eyelash about killing millions of your countrymen if they got out of line.
            Actually, Urban Ranger and I in a country that provides a lot of the democratic freedoms that are available in the US: a free press, freedom of speech and religion, no forced abortion, and an established rule of law. All of these freedoms exist in China, albeit not everywhere.

            And unlike the US, the China where UR and I live does not have the death penalty, it has an extremely low crime rate, and it has universal health care. Unfortunately, just like the US, it has a crappy education system.

            As for killing millions of Chinese citizens, the government where UR and I live is too incompetent to know how to do it, although I suspect they wouldn't have any qualms about doing it.

            And if you still haven't figured it out, UR and I live in People's Republic of China's city of Hong Kong.
            Golfing since 67

            Comment


            • #51
              The point that many people will vote for the US, even if they don't believe it, just to be a smart-ass?


              Yep, seems like it .

              Though at least it is losing to NKorea!
              “I give you a new commandment, that you love one another. Just as I have loved you, you also should love one another. By this everyone will know that you are my disciples, if you have love for one another.”
              - John 13:34-35 (NRSV)

              Comment


              • #52
                Originally posted by Imran Siddiqui
                The point that many people will vote for the US, even if they don't believe it, just to be a smart-ass?


                Yep, seems like it .

                Though at least it is losing to NKorea!
                We can soon fix that.
                Golfing since 67

                Comment


                • #53
                  The putting of the "" next to "USA" is a bad, bad choice - it draws attention. My vote would have gone to North Korea otherwise.
                  Poor silly humans. A temporarily stable pattern of matter and energy stumbles upon self-cognizance for a moment, and suddenly it thinks the whole universe was created for its benefit. -- mbelleroff

                  Comment


                  • #54
                    Yeah, but that's all right, since everyone knows it's the comedy choice.
                    No, I did not steal that from somebody on Something Awful.

                    Comment


                    • #55
                      USA. Bunch of dumb****s.

                      Many good candidates omitted.
                      Somalia, a prime example.
                      Almost any place in Africa, actually.
                      Central America is pretty dicey living conditions.

                      And to say nothing of Canada.
                      Life is not measured by the number of breaths you take, but by the moments that take your breath away.
                      "Hating America is something best left to Mobius. He is an expert Yank hater.
                      He also hates Texans and Australians, he does diversify." ~ Braindead

                      Comment


                      • #56
                        Well, since the question says country, not government, I have to go with the US.

                        The difference being that in most of the other options, it is the governments which totalitarian and oppressive, and in the US (and Canada too, just to a lesser extent), it is the corporate world and agenda. The brainwashing and the brainwashers may be different, but just as potent, if not more so. I can't think of a thing in US society that can't be swayed by the almighty dollar.

                        Comment


                        • #57
                          Originally posted by The Mad Monk
                          Well, the 'peaceful protestors with tanks' bit says China to me.

                          Of course you never hear about the protests in North Korea.

                          For the education of the masses:

                          http://1stopkorea.com/nk-trip1.htm
                          Very Very Good.

                          Comment


                          • #58
                            USA! USA! USA!
                            We the people are the rightful masters of both Congress and the courts, not to overthrow the Constitution but to overthrow the men who pervert the Constitution. - Abraham Lincoln

                            Comment


                            • #59
                              .
                              Attached Files
                              We the people are the rightful masters of both Congress and the courts, not to overthrow the Constitution but to overthrow the men who pervert the Constitution. - Abraham Lincoln

                              Comment


                              • #60
                                Korea is the most oppressive on the list but China is te biggest world threat.

                                The point i want add is: Geneva convention? International treaties? Do some research to see what the US has signed, has not signed but supports, etc. ... also for fun look up the history of the first 15 years of the relationship of the UN and the US
                                I would rather have a bottle in front of me than a frontal labotamy

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X