Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Yes - It's More AI CHEATING!

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #46
    Oh, yea, my mistake. You can continue building the obselete unit when you hook up the resource for the new one, and that was what I was thinking of.
    "You're the biggest user of hindsight that I've ever known. Your favorite team, in any sport, is the one that just won. If you were a woman, you'd likely be a slut." - Slowwhand, to Imran

    Eschewing silly games since December 4, 2005

    Comment


    • #47
      I think Firaxis made the mistake of creating a game that is intellectually too challenged for many people.

      Comment


      • #48
        Do you mean challenging? Intellectually challenged would infer the opposite, i.e. that the game is too stupid.

        I certainly agree that the difficulty level is now significantly higher than Civ I or II so some people may be upset that they cannot defeat say emperor mode with the same consummate ease as the previous games.
        To doubt everything or to believe everything are two equally convenient solutions; both dispense with the necessity of reflection.
        H.Poincaré

        Comment


        • #50
          Originally posted by panag
          hi ,

          the AI knows the nation behind a unit that is flagged 'hidden nationality" , ....

          have a nice day
          So would I though. It should be pretty obvious. Having said that I've never seen the AI use a privateer...
          Do not be too proud of this technological terror you've constructed...

          Comment


          • #51
            Originally posted by TacticalGrace


            So would I though. It should be pretty obvious. Having said that I've never seen the AI use a privateer...
            hi ,

            its not only with the privateer , its also when you flag it in a mod or scenario, with other units

            have a nice day
            - RES NON VERBA - DE OPRESSO LIBER - VERITAS ET LIBERTAS - O TOLMON NIKA - SINE PARI - VIGLIA PRETIUM LIBERTAS - SI VIS PACEM , PARA BELLUM -
            - LEGIO PATRIA NOSTRA - one shot , one kill - freedom exists only in a book - everything you always wanted to know about special forces - everything you always wanted to know about Israel - what Dabur does in his free time , ... - in french - “Become an anti-Semitic teacher for 5 Euro only.”
            WHY DOES ISRAEL NEED A SECURITY FENCE --- join in an exceptional demo game > join here forum is now open ! - the new civ Conquest screenshots > go see them UPDATED 07.11.2003 ISRAEL > crisis or challenge ?

            Comment


            • #52
              If you pay attention you can tell also but you can't start a war with it.
              Was gone for two years, I'm back now.
              in a 3D world is there a difference between these: b d q p | / - \
              3D Unit tutorial
              My units: MechWalker,Rocket soldier,Hover Tank,Crawler,Hover Copter

              Comment


              • #53
                Originally posted by Grumbold
                Do you mean challenging? Intellectually challenged would infer the opposite, i.e. that the game is too stupid.

                I certainly agree that the difficulty level is now significantly higher than Civ I or II so some people may be upset that they cannot defeat say emperor mode with the same consummate ease as the previous games.
                Maybe the game is too easy for you, but most whinings I see here are people who got their ass kicked by the AI. Then they went on whining about how much the AI cheats. In most cases, their claims were unsupported and unsubstantiated, like the thread starter.

                Comment


                • #54
                  Originally posted by Lord Merciless
                  Maybe the game is too easy for you, but most whinings I see here are people who got their ass kicked by the AI. Then they went on whining about how much the AI cheats. In most cases, their claims were unsupported and unsubstantiated, like the thread starter.
                  That was my point - the game is intellectually challenging, not intellectually challenged. So some people understandably feel that, with the much stronger AI in the latest Civ game, that there is no need for it to play in an annoying style or by different rules to the human opponent. For example not respecting your borders for at least a few turns after agreeing to retreat. Areas where it seems the AI is cheating are therefore especially hot topics and produce a lot of extreme language on both sides. Kicking someone for not having savegame proof or using the emotive language like 'whining' is hardly helpful. Do you save all your games every turn in case you want to haul it up in evidence for the amateur judge and jury panel on Apolyton? I certainly don't.
                  To doubt everything or to believe everything are two equally convenient solutions; both dispense with the necessity of reflection.
                  H.Poincaré

                  Comment


                  • #55
                    Well so far I haven't seen any evidence that the AI "cheats" more than human players.
                    Do not be too proud of this technological terror you've constructed...

                    Comment


                    • #56
                      Originally posted by Grumbold
                      Do you save all your games every turn in case you want to haul it up in evidence for the amateur judge and jury panel on Apolyton? I certainly don't.
                      If I decide to start a thread called "More AI CHEATING!!!" I will DEFINITELY back up my claims with some save game evidence.

                      Comment


                      • #57
                        Well I'm sure the original poster feels the same way, if s/he ever bothers to come back to talk to such a hostile audience again. Perhaps they were expecting a slightly more sympathetic reception but all experienced Apolytoners know that if you declare something as a fact rather than stating it is your belief and humbly asking for enlightenment from the founts of wisdom then someone somewhere will rip your head off for doing so....
                        To doubt everything or to believe everything are two equally convenient solutions; both dispense with the necessity of reflection.
                        H.Poincaré

                        Comment


                        • #58
                          Well I can back this statement 100% the AI cheats like hell it's even more than in Civ II. Furthermore the AI is overly aggressive: They reject my demands all the time, they often declare war due to minor incidents (e.g. some very small demands from my side) and in the end you are being hatred by the whole world. I assume the AI is special programmed to hamper the human civ whenever possible.
                          Dance to Trance

                          Proud and official translator of Yaroslavs Civilization-Diplomacy utility.

                          Comment


                          • #59
                            Originally posted by Galvatron
                            Well I can back this statement 100% the AI cheats like hell it's even more than in Civ II. Furthermore the AI is overly aggressive: They reject my demands all the time, they often declare war due to minor incidents (e.g. some very small demands from my side) and in the end you are being hatred by the whole world. I assume the AI is special programmed to hamper the human civ whenever possible.
                            I find it relatively easy to control the political situation in most games. I can usually avoid war for as long as necesssary, or attract allies to my side. In "German Valor," I had so much native land to settle that I put off war until the Age of Panzers. Plus I wanted to test my blitzkrieg technique against mature, culturally advanced rivals.





                            If the AI is programmed to hamper the human civ, they shouldn't have let me advance unhindered until I had Panzers.

                            Comment


                            • #60
                              Originally posted by Galvatron
                              Well I can back this statement 100% the AI cheats like hell it's even more than in Civ II.
                              Example?

                              Furthermore the AI is overly aggressive: They reject my demands all the time,
                              We have already established that you do the same. Why should they give up for free what they have earned?

                              they often declare war due to minor incidents (e.g. some very small demands from my side)
                              Most human players will declare war with no reason whatsoever.

                              and in the end you are being hatred by the whole world. I assume the AI is special programmed to hamper the human civ whenever possible.
                              What we have to establish is whether the AI civs give each other special treatment or whether it treats the human player just like any other civ. Given the way you seem to play, making demands of the other civs etc it shouldn't surprising that they declare war on you.
                              Do not be too proud of this technological terror you've constructed...

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              X