Why Joan over Napoleon? Is it some PC thing where Firaxis thought they had to give some of the leader positions to women? Napoleon deserves to sit next to Julius, Alexander, and Elizabeth. I have nothing against Joan, but I don't think she should bump Napoleon for the spot.
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Napoleon
Collapse
X
-
Coracle,
I changed her to Napoleon months ago. There are sites posted that supply new heads you can download."In Italy for 30 years under the Borgias, they had warfare, terror, murder and bloodshed. But they produced Michelangelo, Leonardo da Vinci and the Renaissance. In Switzerland, they had brotherly love. They had 500 years of democracy and peace. And what did that produce? The cuckoo clock."
—Orson Welles as Harry Lime
Comment
-
Coracle, if Joan "sexed up" civ, I would imagine you think that Civ2 was not sexed up. In that case, please explain to me:
1) The viking herald. I beleive the manual even has an acknowledgement to the artist who "finally put some clothes on the viking herald."
2) The egyptian herald, who looks more like a pole dancer than an ambassador.
Hey Coracle: I know you may not be old enough to understand it, but: cleavage is a fact of life. Yep. Civ3 is less "sexed up" than Civ2, and the fact that you can't handle a basic piece of the female anatomy probably better than a small child isn't something you want to be yelling out to everyone at Apolyton. Then again, if you are looking for our disdain...Lime roots and treachery!
"Eventually you're left with a bunch of unmemorable posters like Cyclotron, pretending that they actually know anything about who they're debating pointless crap with." - Drake Tungsten
Comment
-
Originally posted by Coracle
Why not Napoleon??
Because Firaxis in its tawdriness wanted to "sex up" the game, and be pathetically Politically Correct with all those female leaders.
I changed her to Napoleon months ago. There are sites posted that supply new heads you can download.I drink to one other, and may that other be he, to drink to another, and may that other be me!
Comment
-
Originally posted by Mongoose
Firaxis did not 'insert' the Zulus. They've been in the game since CIV 1, IIRC. At the very least, they were in CIV2.Nym
"Der Krieg ist die bloße Fortsetzung der Politik mit anderen Mitteln." (Carl von Clausewitz, Vom Kriege)
Comment
-
Considering that the french UU is the musketeer, I would have considered Louis XIV the best leader for France.
Of course, I can't protest to have my dear Napoléon chosen
Jeanne d'Arc was perhaps a huge symbol in France unity, but she was never the country ruler, only an emblematic icon. She should be a great leader, NOT the ruler.Science without conscience is the doom of the soul.
Comment
-
Originally posted by LordAngus
Clearly the best choice to represent France is Charles "The Hammer" Martel. His defeat of a Muslim army in 732 checked the spread of Islam into Western Europe. Without The Hammer there would have been no Carolingian Emire, no Charlemagne.To us, it is the BEAST.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Coracle
Why not Napoleon??
Because Firaxis in its tawdriness wanted to "sex up" the game, and be pathetically Politically Correct with all those female leaders.
I changed her to Napoleon months ago. There are sites posted that supply new heads you can download.Do the Job
Remember the World Trade Center
Comment
-
I think that the leaders are chosen based on upon the fact that they are responsible for "nationalisim". Jean D'Arc helped Unite France. Abe Lincon not only kept america as one country; but was the first president to really _think_ of it as one country; or at least one of the first. Bismark unified Germany, right (even with a Prussian Grandmother, my knowlage of german history is shaky)? Elizebeth is a harder case to make, but she allowed both protestent and Catholic to co-exist, arguably keeping her nation together...
Some of the other leaders seem based more on fame. Without looking it up on the internet, who can name another leader of the Zulu?Do the Job
Remember the World Trade Center
Comment
-
Just to cast my vote, I prefer Napoleon too. I imagine he is enormously popular with great-ruler-wannabes who would play Civ, so I was surprised when he was replaced.
I think he much better represents what a Civ leader is doing. After all, your civ starts out already united anyway.
Hey, he was even on the back of the Civ1 box!Good = Love, Love = Good
Evil = Hate, Hate = Evil
Comment
Comment