Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Napoleon

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #16
    I'm torn. Thinking about significance, my preference would probably be Napoleon, followed by de Gaulle (sentimental reasons).

    But on the other hand, without Joan for sex value, all we have are Cleo and the Domestic Nag.

    ...ALL the leaders should be young ladies!
    I hate oral!!

    Comment


    • #17
      Originally posted by Sava


      True, but there are countless decisive battles like that throughout history. I think you need to rank overall achievement. Martel's victory might have been more important in the long run, but Napoleon swept across Europe with ease. It's just unfortunate he didn't plan ahead when he attacked Russia.
      That seems to be a trait of European megalomaniacs doesn't it?

      Comment


      • #18
        Originally posted by Mongoose
        Firaxis did not 'insert' the Zulus. They've been in the game since CIV 1, IIRC. At the very least, they were in CIV2.
        I only played Civ for the SNES. I didn't bother with Civ1, Civ2 because of the senate. I skipped them for Civ3.
        I drink to one other, and may that other be he, to drink to another, and may that other be me!

        Comment


        • #19
          You didn't buy Civ2 simply because of the Senate? That seems like a pretty small gripe to pass up such a good game... why not just go Commie or Fundy?

          He's right, though, the Zulus have been in since the beginning. The reason they are a Middle Eastern Civ is not because they were thrown in at the last minute, but because Firaxis didn't want to throw in more random African civs to make another culture set.
          Lime roots and treachery!
          "Eventually you're left with a bunch of unmemorable posters like Cyclotron, pretending that they actually know anything about who they're debating pointless crap with." - Drake Tungsten

          Comment


          • #20
            Re: Attacking Russia and not thinking ahead
            Originally posted by Willem

            That seems to be a trait of European megalomaniacs doesn't it?
            Huh? Nelson never attacked Russia...
            Do the Job

            Remember the World Trade Center

            Comment


            • #21
              We've had this debate a thousand times before.
              "The great rule of conduct for us in regard to foreign nations is to have with them as little political connection as possible... It is our true policy to steer clear of permanent alliances with any portion of the foreign world, so far as we are now at liberty to do it." George Washington- September 19, 1796

              Comment


              • #22
                Originally posted by Andrew Cory
                Re: Attacking Russia and not thinking ahead

                Huh? Nelson never attacked Russia...
                Now how do you equate Nelson with megalomania? He's barely a footnote in European history as I understand it, just another military lackey operating on orders from on high. That's hardly the trait of a megalomaniac, like Napolean and Hitler. Mind you I don't know a great deal about him, but he doesn't really fit my concept of the term.

                Comment


                • #23
                  Originally posted by Willem


                  Now how do you equate Nelson with megalomania? He's barely a footnote in European history as I understand it, just another military lackey operating on orders from on high. That's hardly the trait of a megalomaniac, like Napolean and Hitler. Mind you I don't know a great deal about him, but he doesn't really fit my concept of the term.
                  At that Battle of Copenhagen when the British sneak attacked the Danish fleet, nelson "turned a blind eye" to his commanding admiral's orders because Nelson had other ideas.

                  Maybe not megalomania, but something.

                  Comment


                  • #24
                    Originally posted by Willem


                    Now how do you equate Nelson with megalomania? He's barely a footnote in European history as I understand it, just another military lackey operating on orders from on high. That's hardly the trait of a megalomaniac, like Napolean and Hitler. Mind you I don't know a great deal about him, but he doesn't really fit my concept of the term.
                    Well, to be honest, I was just talking out of my butt. The important thing was to mention a _navel_ officer, and one that had a good reputation...
                    Do the Job

                    Remember the World Trade Center

                    Comment


                    • #25
                      Originally posted by Willem
                      Now how do you equate Nelson with megalomania? He's barely a footnote in European history as I understand it, just another military lackey operating on orders from on high. That's hardly the trait of a megalomaniac, like Napolean and Hitler. Mind you I don't know a great deal about him, but he doesn't really fit my concept of the term.
                      Nelson was not a megalomaniac. He was a great naval commander, and loyal to the crown. He defeated the French fleet which protected England from invasion by Napoleon. Before the Battle of Trafalgar he said, "England expects that every man will do his duty." When he died victorious he said, "Now I am satisfied. Thank God, I have done my duty.”
                      Attached Files
                      Last edited by Zachriel; April 25, 2002, 21:56.

                      Comment


                      • #26
                        Ooohhh wouldn't Napoleon be mad if he found out a thread about him got turned into a thread about Nelson!

                        Heh heh

                        Now I'm reminded of that quote in the Civ2 scenario ... something like 'wherever wood can float, there I find that flag of England!'
                        Good = Love, Love = Good
                        Evil = Hate, Hate = Evil

                        Comment


                        • #27
                          Originally posted by nato
                          Ooohhh wouldn't Napoleon be mad if he found out a thread about him got turned into a thread about Nelson!


                          Was this supposed to be a picture of Napoleon at Saint Helena? Good likeness.



                          Comment


                          • #28
                            Originally posted by Akka le Vil
                            Considering that the french UU is the musketeer, I would have considered Louis XIV the best leader for France.
                            considering the panzer is the UU for germany, i would have considered Hitler the best leader for germany.
                            "I've lived too long with pain. I won't know who I am without it. We have to leave this place, I am almost happy here."
                            - Ender, from Ender's Game by Orson Scott Card

                            Comment


                            • #29
                              Originally posted by UberKruX


                              considering the panzer is the UU for germany, i would have considered Hitler the best leader for germany.
                              He probably would have been provided he was not so politically incorrect.
                              Science without conscience is the doom of the soul.

                              Comment


                              • #30
                                Creator of the Civ3MultiTool

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X