*****COMPLETELY OFF TOPIC ********************
LordAzreal, you have the coolest quote ever...
Bananas...
[MONKEY VOICE: agrivated]oo oo oo ah ah AH AHHH!!HA AAAAAHA H!!!!AHA!HAHAH!!!!!!!!AAAAAAAAAAAAA HHHHHHAAAAAAAA!!![/MONKEY VOICE]
*****ON TOPIC*********************************
This game has a much richer diplomatic model than Civ2. You can actually make and keep allies (try THAT in Civ2). You can be pissed at someone WITHOUT being at war with them!!! You can NOT BE AT WAR WITH SOMEONE!!!
I use this to my advantage. Obviously, giving a little civ some stuff to throw stones at an enemy is good. I try to think long term as well. Sure, the Egyptians are a medium sized non-threat. But if I let the Indians starve, they will be swallowed and then the Egyptians are that much stronger.
Most games so far have been me making relatively small conquests. I won't touch the other side of the world, but I'll make sure there's a balance of power there.
LordAzreal, you have the coolest quote ever...
What is with all this 'bananas' crap. What point am I missing here? Could someone please clarify what this obsession with bananas on the Apolyton forums is all about?
[MONKEY VOICE: agrivated]oo oo oo ah ah AH AHHH!!HA AAAAAHA H!!!!AHA!HAHAH!!!!!!!!AAAAAAAAAAAAA HHHHHHAAAAAAAA!!![/MONKEY VOICE]
*****ON TOPIC*********************************
This game has a much richer diplomatic model than Civ2. You can actually make and keep allies (try THAT in Civ2). You can be pissed at someone WITHOUT being at war with them!!! You can NOT BE AT WAR WITH SOMEONE!!!
I use this to my advantage. Obviously, giving a little civ some stuff to throw stones at an enemy is good. I try to think long term as well. Sure, the Egyptians are a medium sized non-threat. But if I let the Indians starve, they will be swallowed and then the Egyptians are that much stronger.
Most games so far have been me making relatively small conquests. I won't touch the other side of the world, but I'll make sure there's a balance of power there.
Comment