Originally posted by Ozymandous
Will it mean that Civ3 would have been/done better if they had taken some chances?
Will it mean that Civ3 would have been/done better if they had taken some chances?
Originally posted by Ozymandous
Oh, and how about C&C, Red Alert, etc, all the games that kept the same previously successful idea and either did worse or not as well as their competitors?
Oh, and how about C&C, Red Alert, etc, all the games that kept the same previously successful idea and either did worse or not as well as their competitors?
Originally posted by Ozymandous
Innovation is not a bad thing, game companies just need to find the thin line between truly upgrading their ideas and changing the foundation of the game so that all those who are afraid to change will not even try it.
"Ahh, new idea, run away, run away!"
Innovation is not a bad thing, game companies just need to find the thin line between truly upgrading their ideas and changing the foundation of the game so that all those who are afraid to change will not even try it.
"Ahh, new idea, run away, run away!"


Comment