Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Computer Games Cover Story

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #31
    Originally posted by Skanky Burns

    I think that each city's border size is directly related to the amount of culture that that city produces.

    Proof at http://www.civ3.com/gallery.cfm , middle right, the cultural advisor screen.
    Under influence, each city has either a 3 or a 4, and ive seen ones with 0, 1 and 2 before as well...
    I have to admit that you seem to be right. I checked also older screenshots of the Cultural advisor, and the city´s "influence" was called "city border size" there. The best evidence for city-individual borders, however, is the mini-map on the screenshot you cited: The green and the yellow civ both seem to have cities with a border size of 1 and cities with a border size of 2 or 3.
    "As far as general advice on mod-making: Go slow as far as adding new things to the game until you have the basic game all smoothed out ... Make sure the things you change are really imbalances and not just something that doesn't fit with your particular style of play." - WesW

    Comment


    • #32
      Is there any chance of getting any scanned pictures, if there are any decent new ones?
      Speaking of Erith:

      "It's not twinned with anywhere, but it does have a suicide pact with Dagenham" - Linda Smith

      Comment


      • #33
        I agree. I think that individual cities' cultural points contribute to the civ's culture. Borders are determined city by city, but obviously cities' borders connect and form a larger border. But each city creates its own contribution to the larger civ culture based on the buildings within that city. So though borders are a national thing they are determined city by city. Did that clarify anything?

        Also thanks to Falconius for his contributions...

        Comment


        • #34
          They don't mention it in the arrticle, but will there be Sea Cities in the game? I hope not because I hated them in SMAC it and the other square improvments made the map imposable to look at.
          I have walked since the dawn of time and were ever I walk, death is sure to follow. As surely as night follows day.

          Comment


          • #35
            Originally posted by Deathwalker
            They don't mention it in the arrticle, but will there be Sea Cities in the game? I hope not because I hated them in SMAC it and the other square improvments made the map imposable to look at.
            We dont know yet... If they did exist, they would probably only exist in the modern era, and Firaxis arent showing those screenshots yet

            Id prefer them not to be in as well
            I'm building a wagon! On some other part of the internets, obviously (but not that other site).

            Comment


            • #36
              The cultural border expansion certainly sounds city specific. I'd be a little unhappier if the cultural victory relies on a single city reaching the set total. All sorts of silliness like packing all the cultural wonders into one city would come into play. Why should one nation win if it reaches 100,000 in its capital and only 50,000 in its next best if a second nation has ten cities at 80,000+?

              The ironworks wonder also sounds odd. If one nation has a dozen cities packing iron and coal why shouldn't they all be industrial marvels? If another nation imports all its coal and iron, whats to stop them shipping it all to a dedicated industrial centre of their own? This sounds far less of a unique item than a spy centre or military headquarters where more than one is pointless. Some sort of fudge to get a production wonder, no doubt.
              To doubt everything or to believe everything are two equally convenient solutions; both dispense with the necessity of reflection.
              H.Poincaré

              Comment


              • #37
                I doubt there will be sea cities or space cities as some people have requested. The full tech tree on Gamespot is almost a mirror reflection of the Civ2 tech tree, at least in terms of future-techs, or the lack there-of. For that reason I think its a pretty safe assumption that sea and space cities will not be in Civ3.

                Off-shore refinery tile improvements may exist in Civ3 however. The tech is making a return from Civ2 and as long as its only useful on specials resources in the ocean, not every tile as in SMAC, I think it'd be pretty cool to see a few scattered off-shore refineries in Civ3. However I suspect that they'll remain as city-improvements instead.

                Comment


                • #38
                  Originally posted by The diplomat
                  I wonder what "Heroic Epic" or the "IronWork" do.
                  I reckon the latter will endow some kind of production bonus, either a percentage (10% or something) or a number (+2 resources per base) I reckon...

                  And as for Heroic Epic, well I suppose it establishes a kind of storytelling tradition and a story which will fascinate millions. So obviously it will help quell unhappiness, methinks...
                  Speaking of Erith:

                  "It's not twinned with anywhere, but it does have a suicide pact with Dagenham" - Linda Smith

                  Comment


                  • #39
                    My take is "IronWorks" is similar to "CIA." You have to first build IronWorks before creating units using iron weapons.

                    As for "Heroic Epic," it sounds like some big literary work a la Homer's Odessy. Seems like it will add to a civ's cultural rating.
                    (\__/) 07/07/1937 - Never forget
                    (='.'=) "Claims demand evidence; extraordinary claims demand extraordinary evidence." -- Carl Sagan
                    (")_(") "Starting the fire from within."

                    Comment


                    • #40
                      Originally posted by dainbramaged13
                      I liked the city-individual borders a lot better, and realy theres no real evidence against them yet. i dont think
                      I certainly agree with above. City culture-borders must be city-indevidual, depending on cultural city-improvements in that particular city. Otherwise you have the same stupid erratic "instant border-boxing" phenomen as in SMAC.
                      And with 1-pop newbie-cities founded far away on other islands, and instantly granted with a huge overproportional culture-borders from the very start, for no other reason then the city belonging to an culturally advanced Civ.

                      Oh God, I really hope that collectively expanding city culture-borders only is a grave missunderstanding!
                      Free collective bonus-layers as a result of cultural Big Wonders, yes - but nothing more then that. And only to cities above a certain threshold-level.
                      Last edited by Ralf; August 31, 2001, 14:13.

                      Comment


                      • #41
                        Originally posted by Skanky Burns
                        I think that each city's border size is directly related to the amount of culture that that city produces.

                        Proof at http://www.civ3.com/gallery.cfm , middle right, the cultural advisor screen.
                        Under influence, each city has either a 3 or a 4, and ive seen ones with 0, 1 and 2 before as well...
                        Thanks Skanky Burns! I feel a whole lot better know. Phew!

                        Comment


                        • #42
                          Culture victory and city radii

                          "The Culture victory is another peaceful option, and perhaps the most intriguing. It requires that you build up a Culture rating high enough to extend your borders six tiles out from at least one of your cities, establishing your tribe as the most influential (and therefor dominant) culture in the game." This means 100,000 culture in one city and that city radius is specific by city.

                          Comment


                          • #43
                            Additional info

                            I agree, seems the city radius/border will depend on the individual city culture rating. Heh, if the cities are like the one pictured in the article (has Palace, Temple, Marketplace, Library maybe more) that only produces 28 culture per turn, has been around from 3650 BC till 1880 AD and has 5396 total culture it may be very hard to win this way.

                            One other thing I am not sure if anyone mentioned...

                            "...(once an elite unit is promoted to a leader) If you send a leader back to one of your cities, he can do one of three things: he can finish production of whatever project the city is working on, he can lead an army, or he can build a military academy that allows the city to produce armies that don't require leaders."

                            Not sure if it had been covered before about leaders building a military academy or not, but I wonder if the player can even build an army, even if he/she has more than 4 cities, until a leader has built an academy?

                            Anyone know?

                            Comment


                            • #44
                              Re: Additional info

                              Originally posted by Ozymandous
                              "...(once an elite unit is promoted to a leader) If you send a leader back to one of your cities, he can do one of three things: he can finish production of whatever project the city is working on, he can lead an army, or he can build a military academy that allows the city to produce armies that don't require leaders."
                              If Great Leaders can finish Wonders, then it looks like they have replaced the caravan has the "Wonder rusher".

                              I think this is good. It was way too easy in civ2 to have one city build a Wonder, and have other cities build caravans to finish the Wonder in just a few turns. The production capacity of a city no longer really mattered. With Great Leaders, this will be more interesting. Unlike, caravans, we won't be able to simply mass produce them to finish any Wonder. With GL's we will have to decide whether to finish a Wonder or use it to stack an army. These kind of decisions are what make civ such a compelling game to play!
                              'There is a greater darkness than the one we fight. It is the darkness of the soul that has lost its way. The war we fight is not against powers and principalities, it is against chaos and despair. Greater than the death of flesh is the death of hope, the death of dreams. Against this peril we can never surrender. The future is all around us, waiting, in moments of transition, to be born in moments of revelation. No one knows the shape of that future or where it will take us. We know only that it is always born in pain.'"
                              G'Kar - from Babylon 5 episode "Z'ha'dum"

                              Comment


                              • #45
                                Originally posted by Urban Ranger
                                My take is "IronWorks" is similar to "CIA." You have to first build IronWorks before creating units using iron weapons.
                                I doubt it, if you see the little walkthrough for use of resources, there is no evidence that an iron works is required before you can produce iron based units, although you never know I suppose...
                                Speaking of Erith:

                                "It's not twinned with anywhere, but it does have a suicide pact with Dagenham" - Linda Smith

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X