Ok, three questions for the committee:
1- Are every member of the committee supporting this poll?
2 - The options in a poll could be in the format suggested by Ghengis ?
3- in affirmative case, could the poll be in the following form?
A- Gaia and Contaginon (Pasagardae)
B- Macross City and City On a Hill ( New Tyre)
C- Macross City and Geofront
D- Macross City and Napoleton
E- Chiquita and Antioch (occupied)
The Chiquita option dont have the Ghengis agreement, based on comments from Godking.
So, guys… only three questions…
To the committee: please, make any final changes or comments as soon as you can.
The last problem refers to the duration of the poll and runoff (if we choose the "two poll" format):
1- Are every member of the committee supporting this poll?
2 - The options in a poll could be in the format suggested by Ghengis ?
Originally posted by GhengisFarb
.
…..But since they have different radi it would probably be a good idea to iron out which should go where.
Maybe offer cities as pairs first
1) Macross CIty and Tyre
Then run a second poll for the winning city set that determines whether they want the Palace in Macross City or Tyre, the loser gets the FP.
We can offer more that four city sets, but I think the winner should have at least 50% of the vote, with the half that got the least amount of votes being dropped from the next poll.
.
…..But since they have different radi it would probably be a good idea to iron out which should go where.
Maybe offer cities as pairs first
1) Macross CIty and Tyre
Then run a second poll for the winning city set that determines whether they want the Palace in Macross City or Tyre, the loser gets the FP.
We can offer more that four city sets, but I think the winner should have at least 50% of the vote, with the half that got the least amount of votes being dropped from the next poll.
A- Gaia and Contaginon (Pasagardae)
B- Macross City and City On a Hill ( New Tyre)
C- Macross City and Geofront
D- Macross City and Napoleton
E- Chiquita and Antioch (occupied)
The Chiquita option dont have the Ghengis agreement, based on comments from Godking.
So, guys… only three questions…
To the committee: please, make any final changes or comments as soon as you can.
The last problem refers to the duration of the poll and runoff (if we choose the "two poll" format):
Originally posted by GhengisFarb
The only problem is our constitution forces us to wait 3 weeks between a poll and a runoff, so we have to take months to get an accurate opinion from the people or jsut go with a gut feeling and run one poll.
I never liked that 3 week wait for a runoff clause, it makes getting people's opinions highly inefficient.
The only problem is our constitution forces us to wait 3 weeks between a poll and a runoff, so we have to take months to get an accurate opinion from the people or jsut go with a gut feeling and run one poll.
I never liked that 3 week wait for a runoff clause, it makes getting people's opinions highly inefficient.
Comment