Trip.
I agree to putting infrastructure in front of the military. If we build too much military at the expense of infrastructure, then before too long we'll be stuck with a bunch of outdated units which we do not have the infrastructure to support properly, and which also can not be upgraded because we have neither the technology nor the wealth required to do so...
That said, I also believe in a strong military. However, I believe that if we have the infrastructure, we can always build the units when they're needed. So, in the early stages of the game, we need a few military units to explore and expand our territory and a few more to guard our infrastructure. Major task forces capable of conducting large scale offensive operations comes later on. (When we have the infrastructure to support them.)
I agree to putting infrastructure in front of the military. If we build too much military at the expense of infrastructure, then before too long we'll be stuck with a bunch of outdated units which we do not have the infrastructure to support properly, and which also can not be upgraded because we have neither the technology nor the wealth required to do so...
That said, I also believe in a strong military. However, I believe that if we have the infrastructure, we can always build the units when they're needed. So, in the early stages of the game, we need a few military units to explore and expand our territory and a few more to guard our infrastructure. Major task forces capable of conducting large scale offensive operations comes later on. (When we have the infrastructure to support them.)
Comment