Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Listing proven cheaters: Yes or no?

Collapse
This topic is closed.
X
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #46
    Bad form is bad form.
    How bad of form is cheating?

    Enough said there. There would be no list needed if people did not find the need to cheat. I don't play Civ II because I am getting paid to do it, I play to have fun. The PBEM's are a lot of fun for me, but the one I was in where cheating happened ruined the whole game.

    So don't talk about bad form by listing the CHEATERS.

    Pap

    Comment


    • #47
      Oh, and who are you to be calling somebody a nobody?

      Just because you have been around longer than Choke, me, whoever else, anyone who decides to come here and post is doing so to have a good time. I never knew there was a Caste system in place here.

      Pap

      Comment


      • #48
        Choke

        (laugh, gag, laugh)

        I just saw the original picture! It is hilarious, but Im afraid the group is right, it aint worth getting banned over.

        But Boy oh Boy it was a riot!

        *"Winning is still the goal, and we cannot win if we lose (gawd, that was brilliant - you can quote me on that if you want. And con - I don't want to see that in your sig."- Beta

        Comment


        • #49
          Originally posted by Darius871
          Um, YES, so don't use that pompous, elitist tone of yours on something you know nothing about.
          If anybody is pompous, it's been you guys.
          How very fortunate that Case happened to have been in the game where he cheated and that he just happened to be reading that thread.
          You just proved WHY no such list is needed, someone would notice.
          If there were a list we wouldn't have to pray for such 'coincidences'.
          You think that list will stop it?
          There are several other examples in the past where the list could have proven useful.
          Bull.

          Feel free to continue; many of us have already decided not to dignify you with response.
          No, you have shown me your closed minded, you didn't like what I said, so you all jumped on it.
          I notice there only seems to be the same 5 of you who really want this.
          Your namecalling and simplistic 'it's wrong, period' argument are wasting our time.
          Your wasting mine, it's time this matter went to a higher authority.
          I believe Saddam because his position is backed up by logic and reason...David Floyd
          i'm an ignorant greek...MarkG

          Comment


          • #50
            Originally posted by Pap1723
            How bad of form is cheating?
            It will become known, that list won't prevent it, it will just show how petty people can be.

            Enough said there. There would be no list needed if people did not find the need to cheat.
            I don't believe such a thread will prevent it.
            I don't play Civ II because I am getting paid to do it, I play to have fun. The PBEM's are a lot of fun for me, but the one I was in where cheating happened ruined the whole game.
            I agree, cheating is terrible, but so is having a stuck thread like that.

            So don't talk about bad form by listing the CHEATERS.
            Still doesn't make it right.

            Oh, and who are you to be calling somebody a nobody?
            Who is he to say shut and my opinion doesn't matter?
            You insult, you get it back.

            And if you want a real thread about what ruins a PBEM game, how about people who don't play turns?
            YOU did that to a game once Pap.

            Just because you have been around longer than Choke, me, whoever else, anyone who decides to come here and post is doing so to have a good time. I never knew there was a Caste system in place here.
            I see, so if I post a contray opinion, it's alright to jump on me, insult me, tell me to shut up, insult the site I moderate, but if I respond, we have a "cast" system.

            Get real Pap.
            I believe Saddam because his position is backed up by logic and reason...David Floyd
            i'm an ignorant greek...MarkG

            Comment


            • #51
              Originally posted by St Leo
              For the moment, I'd prefer it if both sides would shut up.
              I guess nobody bothers to listen to the moderator of this forum



              And the decision of whether the thread will be in this forum or not is up to St Leo, and not subject to some vote. For those that haven't heard it before... This isn't a Democracy

              And last but not least... Would everybody just chill and stop making personal attacks. Everybody is welcome to their own opinion on the subject... and as always at Apolyton... you are free to attack somebodies position on issues... BUT YOU AREN'T ALLOWED TO ATTACK THE INDIVIDUAL.

              I'll leave it to the mod of this forum to take any action he sees fit for stuff posted here... But if people don't stop the personal crap, and St Leo isn't around...
              Keep on Civin'
              RIP rah, Tony Bogey & Baron O

              Comment


              • #52
                But if people don't stop the personal crap, and St Leo isn't around...

                1. I was just mulling things over.

                2. Darius gets to keep and maintain the list. If you have additional concerns about that, please PM me.

                3. Choke and Chris, please relax. You guys are skating close to the edge. I don't care whose fault it is because I've been following this thread from the very beginning and haven't been able to figure that out. No, I don't need help figuring that out. Just stop.

                4. BTW, I have zero tolerance policy on making two posts in a row. It's the only kind of spamming that can be quanitified.
                Blog | Civ2 Scenario League | leo.petr at gmail.com

                Comment

                Working...
                X