The Altera Centauri collection has been brought up to date by Darsnan. It comprises every decent scenario he's been able to find anywhere on the web, going back over 20 years.
25 themes/skins/styles are now available to members. Check the select drop-down at the bottom-left of each page.
Call To Power 2 Cradle 3+ mod in progress: https://apolyton.net/forum/other-games/call-to-power-2/ctp2-creation/9437883-making-cradle-3-fully-compatible-with-the-apolyton-edition
I trust that the current voting, which essentially says 21 "no" to a paltry 3 "yes", answers any concerns that the majority of us think the creation of a Civ3 Democracy Game is a negative thing or that it was in the least way meant to threaten our game.
"Imitation is the sincerest form of flattery".
Civ2 Demo Game #1 City-Planner, President, Historian Civ2 Demo Game #2 Minister of War,President, Minister of Trade, Vice President, City-Planner Civ2 Demo Game #3 President, Minister of War, President Civ2 Demo Game #4 Despot, City-Planner, Consul
Originally posted by -Jrabbit
Ming is another story. As many of you know, we are long-time buddies IRL and I see him at least once a week. It's true that Ming has displayed a disparaging attitude to this forum, at one point (verbally) telling me he thought it was a "dead forum." But so what?: He feels that way about a lot of fora, and he's certainly entitled to his opinion (however myopic and uninformed it may be). In essence, he's just indicating he has no interest in what we're doing. Which is fine.
This is the story I was thinking of, -Jrabbit posted details of that conversation the next day, so at least I didn't dream it. But what I seem to have failed to realise was that -Jrabbit and Ming were such buddies, and that -Jrabbit's post at the time was more in the line of a friendly dig than serious criticism. I apologize unreservedly for any misunderstanding I've caused. No hard feelings I hope.
(I note that Ming denies the quote anyway. Well, that's between him and -Jrabbit, I was just remembering what I had read).
Particular apolosies to MarkG who is clearly entirely innocent of any wrongdoing!! Yes, I did notice that "major update" of May 21. Great stuff.
Originally posted by Hywel Dda
I note that Ming denies the quote anyway. Well, that's between him and -Jrabbit, I was just remembering what I had read.
If I had seen it then, I would have denied it too... It's just not true. JR may have interpreted something differently, but I by NO MEANS EVER SAID SUCH A THING!
If I had seen it then, I would have denied it too... It's just not true. JR may have interpreted something differently, but I by NO MEANS EVER SAID SUCH A THING!
not that you would remember after a heavy night of "whatever you do when rah is using your machine"
all in jest Ming....i know you wouldnt' say anything like that !!!
Originally posted by H Tower
QUOTE: "He (MING) also said that he could take over any AI civ in our game and thrash us with it"
(italics are mine)
and you people want to put ming on the coin
Actually, if I remember correctly, my comment was a long the lines of "a good single player should be able to beat a team effort" because decision by commitee is not the best way to make decisions
I'm going to have to remember to tape our drunken conversations on Friday nights in the future
Comment