Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

The Tale of the Years – 1784 to 1804 AD

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #46
    Originally posted by Ben Kenobi


    Why do you think I have so many posts plugging railroad construction? It's that important to our future success. Nice to see the screenshots up.

    So let's keep cranking out the engineers and Railroads.



    * Ben Kenobi quietly invests in our railroad futures.
    I second that. We should build more engineers and railroads.
    "The price of freedom is eternal vigilance." -Thomas Jefferson
    Former Minister of City Planning of the third Civ2 Democracy Game
    Former Minister of Science of the third Civ2 Democracy Game
    Former Imperial Expansion Minister of the first Civ2 Democracy Game

    Comment


    • #47
      Yes, send existing Engrs to the RR backbone. Build more Engrs to fill out the road networks around our productive cities, especially in the river net.
      (+1 )
      (\__/) Save a bunny, eat more Smurf!
      (='.'=) Sponsored by the National Smurfmeat Council
      (")_(") Smurf, the original blue meat! © 1999, patent pending, ® and ™ (except that "Smurf" bit)

      Comment


      • #48
        Do we really need to have engineers building a RR to doom, plague and petilence? none of these cities are producing troops at this time, and the cities are out of the way, perhaps we should allow these cities to creat their own engineers and allow the one's we have currently working their way north to work on the mainline instead

        Also, I think it might be a good idea to run a road and then RR due south from Detriot, it would lead us to the rest of the Americans and into the heart of Germany. Most of it appears to be grassland as well, providing for quick construction instead of humping numerous mountain ranges to the east where we are attacking the zulus


        I've also have a problem with some of the routes built for our RR, like this one pictured, it would have been much faster to build the RR over the tundra instead of going over the mountain, there are a few other cases of this as well, but this one shows the point i'm trying to make.
        Attached Files

        Comment


        • #49
          I don't have the save anymore, but I would bet that bribing all those heavily rivered US cities was what helped our tech rate. We've been growing a lot.
          "I'm a guy - I take everything seriously except other people's emotions"

          "Never play cards with any man named 'Doc'. Never eat at any place called 'Mom's'. And never, ever...sleep with anyone whose troubles are worse than your own." - Nelson Algren
          "A single death is a tragedy, a million deaths is a statistic." - Joseph Stalin (attr.)

          Comment


          • #50

            Even going through the forest would have been better than the mountain! Are the settlers on auto here? I suppose that at least we have a charged settler here that we could move to a square where we really will need to build over a hill or mountain, but the road has already been built.

            Comment


            • #51
              I'll have a stern word with the Engineer in charge of that portion of the network!

              Civ2 Demo Game #1 City-Planner, President, Historian
              Civ2 Demo Game #2 Minister of War,President, Minister of Trade, Vice President, City-Planner
              Civ2 Demo Game #3 President, Minister of War, President
              Civ2 Demo Game #4 Despot, City-Planner, Consul

              Comment

              Working...
              X