Tweet
Yes I don't do double posts often. Even when it seems to be a must such as when one is facing double opponents. 
-
Be good, and if at first you don't succeed, perhaps failure will be back in fashion soon. -- teh Spamski
Grapefruit Garden -
If you were good you could counter both with one post
*"Winning is still the goal, and we cannot win if we lose (gawd, that was brilliant - you can quote me on that if you want. And con - I don't want to see that in your sig."- BetaComment
-
Exactly.
Be good, and if at first you don't succeed, perhaps failure will be back in fashion soon. -- teh Spamski
Grapefruit GardenComment
-
A true ultrauberspammer replies to one point at a time, not one post.Originally posted by conmcb25
If you were good you could counter both with one post
I'm consitently stupid- Japher
I think that opinion in the United States is decidedly different from the rest of the world because we have a free press -- by free, I mean a virgorously presented right wing point of view on the air and available to all.- NedComment
-
TrueOriginally posted by Theben
A true ultrauberspammer replies to one point at a time, not one post.
*"Winning is still the goal, and we cannot win if we lose (gawd, that was brilliant - you can quote me on that if you want. And con - I don't want to see that in your sig."- BetaComment
-
I have seen instances where a person has replied to one point in two seperate posts. Now that takes skill.I'm building a wagon! On some other part of the internets, obviously (but not that other site).Comment
-
It sure*"Winning is still the goal, and we cannot win if we lose (gawd, that was brilliant - you can quote me on that if you want. And con - I don't want to see that in your sig."- BetaComment
-
does*"Winning is still the goal, and we cannot win if we lose (gawd, that was brilliant - you can quote me on that if you want. And con - I don't want to see that in your sig."- BetaComment
-
I was thinking more like this.I'm building a wagon! On some other part of the internets, obviously (but not that other site).Comment
-
Thats a pretty good example.
Is he in top list or a n00b?*"Winning is still the goal, and we cannot win if we lose (gawd, that was brilliant - you can quote me on that if you want. And con - I don't want to see that in your sig."- BetaComment
-
Can't you just look at his status con? Or are you simply playing b00n for the +1's?
Be good, and if at first you don't succeed, perhaps failure will be back in fashion soon. -- teh Spamski
Grapefruit GardenComment
-
Nah just too lazy.
And Rasputin is a lot better at the numbers than i am.
*"Winning is still the goal, and we cannot win if we lose (gawd, that was brilliant - you can quote me on that if you want. And con - I don't want to see that in your sig."- BetaComment
-
Interesting... still 16.The Party seeks power entirely for its own sake. We are not interested in the good of others; we are interested solely in power. Not wealth or luxury or long life or happiness: only power, pure power.
Join Eventis, the land of spam and unspeakable horrors!Comment
-
For HongHu;
Stats on: "lord of the mark"
Registered Dec11, 2000
1776 Total posts
1.43 posts per day.
Not a n00b, but definately not a spammer like you or Skanky.
*"Winning is still the goal, and we cannot win if we lose (gawd, that was brilliant - you can quote me on that if you want. And con - I don't want to see that in your sig."- BetaComment
-
Or a rabid desire to increase postcount.Originally posted by Skanky Burns
I have seen instances where a person has replied to one point in two seperate posts. Now that takes skill.I'm consitently stupid- Japher
I think that opinion in the United States is decidedly different from the rest of the world because we have a free press -- by free, I mean a virgorously presented right wing point of view on the air and available to all.- NedComment
Comment