Should we remove the edit post feature?

[Dis]

I think I should get an award for the most lopsided poll results in the history of Apolyton.

Surely there has not been a poll with such a lopsided result.

[Skanky Burns]

Own goal?

[Dauphin]

Originally posted by Skanky Burns
He didn't own up to hacking Mings account, obviously.

Pay attention Skanky, I admitted it two posts above this quoted post.

[Arnelos]

Hey, I really do have green eyes, you know.

[HongHu]

How did you know?

[DrSpike]

Nice eyes. Nice and green.

[HongHu]

Nah, Deities are nothing but an empty title.

[Chilean Presidentâ„¢]

Damn! and I was so eager to become Deity..

[DrSpike]

Originally posted by Chilean President
The Godz or the Deities?

It should be the latter, but he meant the former.

[Gatekeeper]

You shall have to pry the edit function from my COLD, DEAD HANDS first!

Gatekeeper

[Skanky Burns]

He didn't own up to hacking Mings account, obviously.

[Chilean Presidentâ„¢]

when I hacked Ming's account....

how didn't you get a permaban?

[Dauphin]

Can't those with near admin power track changes anyway? I recall seeing an 'edit history' tab for posts when I hacked Ming's account....

[duke o' york]

Moving away from the nascent 'poly metaphysical/religious discussion here, then edit functions are vital so that ordinary posters can remain unbanned. If, for example, I was to call Dr Spikey a very nice chap indeed, and someone was to call my attention to the offensive nature of this remark, then I could edit it and avoid any offense, and any need for mod action. This is not to encourage people to post all kinds of rude words and then alter them as soon as they see Ming and rah on the "members online" list on the front page, as these posts can still be reported to mods, with a description of why said post offends them.

[Frankychan]

In other words, he's the enforcer and carries around a big stick to strike those who defy the GodZ.

(voted no as well)