No!
Edit: Still No!
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Should we remove the edit post feature?
Collapse
This topic is closed.
X
X
-
No.
Not on boards where people routinely write long and involved strategy articles. The ability to clarify is essential.
Leave a comment:
-
No.
My typos sometimes transform the meaning of a post - like leaving out the word "not" for example.
Leave a comment:
-
Of course my answer is noway.Or how should I deal with double posts if I cannot edit them down. Or how should I deal with links in my posts when they get invalid or when I make them invalid. Or how should I deal with attachments that none needs or should be removed, because it is for example a piece of slic code that noone should use, because it is so buggy that it should be better replaced by some better code. I find many reasons to keep this features. In the end I am responsible for my posts, and if I come to the conclusion that I cannot take the responsibility for my post anymore I have to change it.
-Martin
Leave a comment:
-
Only three people on 'poly are that evil, and I keep a close eye on the other two.
I voted NO of course.
-Jam
Leave a comment:
-
You know, some people who are evil enough could use this edit feature to really cause a large amount of confusion. I wonder if perhaps we should ban its use.
But thats a topic for another thread.
Leave a comment:
-
I can't be held responsible for certain posters who still can't decide what their posts will actually end up saying. And I refuse to quote the entire page whenever BC posts "just as a precaution".
Although I must admit the block of text has certainly improved since the previous edit.
Btw Spikie, you should change your name to a single syllable.
Leave a comment:
Leave a comment: