Should we remove the edit post feature?

[Dauphin]

Originally posted by Imran Siddiqui
No you tosser... the edit post function is sometimes essential!

I agree with you you bloody tosspot.

[Theben]

Wow, that was a remarkably clear comment from ottok...

[HongHu]

That's why we should make it PLUS member only. Imagine the revenue stream from the new subscribers! (Just kidding.)

[Imran Siddiqui]

No you tosser... the edit post function is sometimes essential!

[Skanky Burns]

I think the site keeps track of edits though.

[Arnelos]

Originally posted by DrSpike
Yeah, we can provoke them into a silly flame war then edit our posts to say "please don't flame" then call Ming.

Recommendation: Edit this post.

[DrSpike]

Yeah, we can provoke them into a silly flame war then edit our posts to say "please don't flame" then call Ming.

[HongHu]

Originally posted by PLATO

Originally posted by MarkG
perhaps make it a PLUS feature

Now that would spark an interesting debate!

Actually it is a very neat idea. We the PLUS members can edit all we want while watching all the silly non PLUS members make all kind of noneditable mistakes.

[Chilean President™]

BTW Dissident I love that Nazi-soup avatar

[Unspeakable Horror]

[Dis]

well I guess that answers it.

I'm just glad the ownership gave this a serious look.

[PLATO]

Originally posted by MarkG
perhaps make it a PLUS feature

Now that would spark an interesting debate!

[Bloody Monk]

Wow!! Very surprising result!!

Not that Ottok gave a one word answer, I mean, really??

But that you understood it!!


****

This experiment seems to be working out rather well. Hope you both are prospering and continueing to have fun. Thanks for a great site, fellows!!

Monk

[DrSpike]

A committee that gave a unanimous answer? Must be right.

[Skanky Burns]