Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

New Multiplayer Game - Peace in Our Time

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • New Multiplayer Game - Peace in Our Time

    Hello all!

    I want to start a different kind of multiplayer game. The idea here is to win by Transcendence, Economy, Diplomacy or Cooperation. No war is permitted. We will build, explore and research. These are our "weapons" and we will always have multiple winners!

    Here are the ideas:

    1) I´m not sure if its possible to gather ALL players in a cooperative victory against the computer. But if thats the case, we can go into that direction. We just gather all players with the same objectives (diplomacy, economy or research) and win (this is the fastest game). Maximum of 3 players, agains 4 computer on transcend level.

    2) We can form two groups of 3 players (or three groups of two players), that fight for a cooperative victory against the other groups. The idea here is that each player support his own group with money, technology and votes in the planetary council, until one of the three victories are reached (money, diplomacy or technology). In this case, groups are allowed to use force only against the computer faction. The only way to conquer cities from the other groups is by EXCHANGING or BUYING. Of course we may use force at will to defend agains the fungus. In case a group wins using diplomacy, we will count the victory to the entire group and not to the player that had the most votes and ended with two "followers" (in case the group was formed by three people). The same goes to Economic Victory and Transcend. We dont have a "winner". We have a GROUP.

    3) We can use the same groups (two groups of three people or three groups of two people) and play with objectives. All players gather in the forum and decide, for example, that the first group that reach $100.000 (combined money), is the winner. Or the first group that gather 500 votes in the planetary council is the winner. Or the first group that build at least 50 Orbital Power Transmiters is the winner... In all those cases, we are creating informal ways of winning and the game will end as soon as the conditions are ok. (For example, if players decided that $100.000 is the condition to win the game and any group reach that condition, this group will immediately wins, even if that money is not enough to display a "Economic Victory". What matters here is to create a condition and go for it, even if the game dont recognize it.


    I accept other ideas and modifications on these. We can go online if people are gathered and PBEM during weeks. Since we are playing with no war, we will go with simultaneous moves to make things go faster.

    Lets go!

  • #2
    I'm game - to make it more competitive you might permit three teams of two players. I'd like to take the Drones if it's two teams of three - the University if it's three teams of two.
    The worst form of insubordination is being right - Keith D., marine veteran. A dictator will starve to the last civilian - self-quoted
    And on the eigth day, God realized it was Monday, and created caffeine. And behold, it was very good. - self-quoted
    Klaatu: I'm impatient with stupidity. My people have learned to live without it.
    Mr. Harley: I'm afraid my people haven't. I'm very sorry… I wish it were otherwise.

    Comment


    • #3
      If we can gather 6 here, it´ll be very fun to play as three teams, lets see how many people will show here!
      I personally prefer the Pirates.

      Comment


      • #4
        I'm interested
        Who is Barinthus?

        Comment


        • #5
          I'm liking this too. I'd go for the Gaians or Data Angels myself
          But there's no sense crying over every mistake. You just keep on trying till you run out of cake.
          PolyCast | Girl playing Civ + extra added babble! | Yo voté en 2008!

          Comment


          • #6
            Im 5th!
            Id go for Morgan or Lal
            (like Univ & Pirates too,but they appear to be taken)

            Also - about those conditions:
            You should consider giving Lal to anyone a bad style - he gets too many votes and can make Golden Age easily and reach high population cause of less Hab restrictions, so he has 3 bonuses!

            Morgan should be placed in one group with Yang, to balance the economy and Drones/Believers should be placed in one group with Univ/Cyborgs to balance research
            Otherwise we could end good players losing only because they like Hive or Believers or because someone gets Lal

            About diplomacy between members of different groups - is it restricted or free (can make even pact) or there is limit of Treaty?
            -- What history has taught us is that people do not learn from history.
            -- Programming today is a race between software engineers striving to build bigger and better idiot-proof programs, and the Universe trying to produce bigger and better idiots. So far, the Universe is winning.

            Comment


            • #7
              I'm flexible about which faction I get... I want to get a confirmation that i'm in before choosing . This should be a fun PBEM and im looking forward to it
              Who is Barinthus?

              Comment


              • #8
                Good! Now we have 5 players!
                I agree with Travkin. We probably have to give Lal to the computer. He has many advantages. I also think that Univ cant go with Cyborgs in the same team. What do you guys think of this combination? We can form two teams inside these factions.

                1) Cyborgs
                Morgan
                Pirates
                Hive

                2) University
                Gaians
                Angels
                Drones

                Or we can form three teams inside those:

                1) Cyborgs
                Pirates

                2) University
                Drones

                3) Morgan
                Hive or Gaians

                About the rules, we will make pact with our comrades but I´m unsure about Treaties with other factions. In time, we can tell, by the income of those treaties, how things are going with then. I prefer to play ignoring totally what the other group is doing (suspense is cool!). But if you prefer that we make treaties, thats ok for me.

                Everybody here is invited to play, to take your seats! I want you to vote on the subject above (about our combinations). Remember that Lal is going to the computer.

                Comment


                • #9
                  I like 3 teams myself - where might the Angels go in a 3 team setup, btw? (Before I ma\ke my final choice )
                  But there's no sense crying over every mistake. You just keep on trying till you run out of cake.
                  PolyCast | Girl playing Civ + extra added babble! | Yo voté en 2008!

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    About those treaties - question was "what is the highest relation allowed for non-group diplomacy"

                    And "treaty" was just a proposal to that maximum.
                    Any other diplomatic state could be considered as maximum also
                    It is completely votable!
                    But I vote for - non-group relations are allowed and any state is allowed,so a player can even get 6 pacts!(very good for peaceful play)
                    -- What history has taught us is that people do not learn from history.
                    -- Programming today is a race between software engineers striving to build bigger and better idiot-proof programs, and the Universe trying to produce bigger and better idiots. So far, the Universe is winning.

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      I take Morgan and therefore go in one team with Hive or Gaians

                      So we have 3 teams with 1 player in each:
                      1)Pirates - Cosmic

                      2)Univ - Shawnmcc

                      3)Morgan - binTravkin

                      Other 2 players should choose their team and fac.
                      For 1st team - should be a researcher fac: CyCon or Angels(techshare, 3)
                      For 2nd team - should be a non-researcher fac: Believers/Hive/Spartans/ChaDawn
                      For 3rd team - should be a not energy-fattened fac: Hive/Gaians/ChaDawn

                      Take your seats gentlemen!

                      And any of you who just enter this thread - we need 1 more player!
                      -- What history has taught us is that people do not learn from history.
                      -- Programming today is a race between software engineers striving to build bigger and better idiot-proof programs, and the Universe trying to produce bigger and better idiots. So far, the Universe is winning.

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        Is probing allowed?
                        Is it considered a reason for Vendetta and therefore a military action?
                        -- What history has taught us is that people do not learn from history.
                        -- Programming today is a race between software engineers striving to build bigger and better idiot-proof programs, and the Universe trying to produce bigger and better idiots. So far, the Universe is winning.

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          Hey Travkin,

                          If we have 6 pacts, our rival group can see what we are doing, building, researching.... I dont think this is good, but we can go for treaties, no problem.

                          One of the cool things in the game will be the decisions made by each individual team.
                          "Well, now we have acess to the Cloning Vaults, who is going to build it? For our group grown strong, we must think in our three factions working synergetically. A very diplomatic game, indeed!

                          I´m not sure about the Angels... since we´re going into a lot of pacts and treaties, the Angels become a disbalanced faction. They´ll know everything in a few turns and unbalance the game! What do you guys think? Lets vote!!

                          And yes, WE NEED ONLY ONE MORE!!!!

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            I kind of prefer three groups but two are fine with me.
                            I don't mind the Cult or Believers if nobody else has an objection.

                            I noted that you wanted stimluatous play - how is that possible? Just for clarification this is PBEM correct?
                            Who is Barinthus?

                            Comment


                            • #15
                              DataAeolus - its your choice now, which group to join!
                              If you want Believers, it should be 2nd group.

                              About Angels - we could consider them a Highly scientific faction and give them to 1st group..
                              -- What history has taught us is that people do not learn from history.
                              -- Programming today is a race between software engineers striving to build bigger and better idiot-proof programs, and the Universe trying to produce bigger and better idiots. So far, the Universe is winning.

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              X