Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Poll: Your FIRST civ (like) game ?

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #16
    My Civ1 computer was a 286 with 512K RAM, 20MB hard disk, and VGA graphics. Pretty much top of the line when I bought it .

    Comment


    • #17
      None of the above... the 1st game I played was a civ-like ASCII game where you started with a few armies ('A') and had to move them to take neutral or enemy cities ('X' or 'x') once taken it would inform you the type of unit it could create, which took so many turns: F= fighter (small case where enemy units), C= carrier, B= battleship, etc. Don't recall the name, and no tech research or settling was required.
      I'm consitently stupid- Japher
      I think that opinion in the United States is decidedly different from the rest of the world because we have a free press -- by free, I mean a virgorously presented right wing point of view on the air and available to all.- Ned

      Comment


      • #18
        My first Civ game:



        This was back on the Amiga

        With the exception of CivRev and of course Civ V, I have played all mentioned Civ games

        Originally posted by Donegeal View Post
        No... he just placed a settler on a transport in Civ I and ordered it to (R)ailroad while in the ocean. Nothing like a railroad around the world!
        This space is empty... or is it?

        Comment


        • #19
          I was ten years old when I received a copy of a game that had just recently come out: Civilization II. Back at the start, I didn't know how to do anything other than move units non-diagonally. It was a while before I learned how to do stuff like build cities, change production, let my units rest, set them to fortify, etc. But at least I eventually figured out the nuances of that game. It prepared me quite well for when I was introduced to Sid Meier's Alpha Centauri three years later.
          Known in most other places as Anon Zytose.
          +3 Research, +2 Efficiency, -1 Growth, -2 Industry, -2 Support.
          http://anonzytose.deviantart.com/

          Comment


          • #20
            Civ3 and its expansions a few days later.I remember losing a nights sleep over the "roman world" scenario. It seemed to me like a great game back then. Anyway, loved civ4 and i can barely wait for civ5!!
            no more turns...

            Comment


            • #21
              Originally posted by Theben View Post
              None of the above... the 1st game I played was a civ-like ASCII game where you started with a few armies ('A') and had to move them to take neutral or enemy cities ('X' or 'x') once taken it would inform you the type of unit it could create, which took so many turns: F= fighter (small case where enemy units), C= carrier, B= battleship, etc. Don't recall the name, and no tech research or settling was required.
              I never heard of that game. I know i forgot free civ, but that is in fact CIV2, so voters that missed freeciv please vote for civ2.

              Originally posted by fani
              Civ3 and its expansions a few days later.I remember losing a nights sleep over the "roman world" scenario. It seemed to me like a great game back then. Anyway, loved civ4 and i can barely wait for civ5!
              Finaly someone that started with civ3.. compliments. Civ3 was not a easy game. Introduction of resources like rubber and oil.

              But it seems that most of us are old players, and die hard civ'ers. Most of us played them all. I even play (and own for xbox 360) Civ Rev. But that is more Civ Crap. it is more for beginners, but I doubt that the beginners from civ rev, are still playing civ games because of the bad game it was.
              Civilization is a game where man dominate a fictive world.. woman does it for real

              Comment


              • #22
                Originally posted by Adagio View Post
                My first Civ game:



                This was back on the Amiga

                With the exception of CivRev and of course Civ V, I have played all mentioned Civ games



                so retro.... nice ehhh such a smart programed game it was. I though I fits on one floppy these days and not even HD, so 720kb or less I believe. and as we all can see... even then there was civilclopidia.
                Civilization is a game where man dominate a fictive world.. woman does it for real

                Comment


                • #23
                  Only had a 320k FDD on my freind's amiga, so it was a lot of swapping disks while it loaded

                  Comment


                  • #24
                    I started playing Civ 1 by downloading it off of a local BBS on my old dial up modem. I actually bought Civ2 when it came out.
                    Try http://wordforge.net/index.php for discussion and debate.

                    Comment


                    • #25
                      Originally posted by Theben View Post
                      None of the above... the 1st game I played was a civ-like ASCII game where you started with a few armies ('A') and had to move them to take neutral or enemy cities ('X' or 'x') once taken it would inform you the type of unit it could create, which took so many turns: F= fighter (small case where enemy units), C= carrier, B= battleship, etc. Don't recall the name, and no tech research or settling was required.
                      Empire. I wasted a lot of time on that one.

                      Comment


                      • #26
                        I played Civ I on SNES. Got a computer shortly after that for Civ II
                        Keep on Civin'
                        RIP rah, Tony Bogey & Baron O

                        Comment


                        • #27
                          Population phase.

                          Avalon Hill Civilization The true original. I have two Okra, Any takers.

                          Comment


                          • #28
                            Originally posted by iamakka View Post
                            I first played Civ I on a freind's Amiga 500

                            When I got my own PC - a 386 SX25, 4mb memory, and a 60mb hard drive - Civilization was amongst the first games I played.

                            I still have Civ I on my mobile phone (using DOSbox)
                            I tried civ1 on my mobile phone (Samsung Omnia pro) using the dosbox, it's starts loading but after a while it goes back to dos with error.

                            My question, CIV2 was also for msdos i think.. so should be possible to run as well on the dosbox (civ1 and civ2 are now abbandonware (So 4 free) My mobile phone had a 16gig card so should be enough
                            Civilization is a game where man dominate a fictive world.. woman does it for real

                            Comment


                            • #29
                              No. You need at least Win 3.11 (3.1 will not do) to play Civ2

                              I started with Civ1 on a friend's 386, then when my parents bought our first computer (a 486 with 4 MB of RAM) I got it off my friend (his father had bought it on a trip to the USA, and it was impossible to get almost any computer game at the time over here), and by the end of the week I could already answer all of the copy protection riddles in the game.
                              Indifference is Bliss

                              Comment


                              • #30
                                Originally posted by DaveV View Post
                                Empire. I wasted a lot of time on that one.
                                That's the one.

                                Now that I think of it though, there was an earlier game on the Trash-80(?) which was more like a build-an-empire-in-medieval-times game. You could build armies and attack each other but most of the time you spent balancing your economy and buying sheep, cows, grain, and cats as your population grew (and declined during famines).

                                The part I remember most was balancing the cat population. Not enough and the rats ate your grain (too many rats and your people got plagued), too many cats and they ate your fish. But we all were afraid of "Super-Cat": if you had just barely over the # to trigger the fish-eating event, the cats would eat 100% of your fish... which normally lead to famine.
                                I'm consitently stupid- Japher
                                I think that opinion in the United States is decidedly different from the rest of the world because we have a free press -- by free, I mean a virgorously presented right wing point of view on the air and available to all.- Ned

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X