I've gone through entire games without horses. I could do without uranium as well depending on how close I am to winning.
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Saltpeter is soooooooo very important!
Collapse
X
-
"And so, my fellow Americans: ask not what your country can do for you—ask what you can do for your country. My fellow citizens of the world: ask not what America will do for you, but what together we can do for the freedom of man." -- JFK Inaugural, 1961
"Extremism in the defense of liberty is not a vice." -- Barry Goldwater, 1964 GOP Nomination acceptance speech (not George W. Bush 40 years later...)
2004 Presidential Candidate
2008 Presidential Candidate (for what its worth)
-
Originally posted by chegitz guevara
If I don't have a resource I need I take it.
Maybe you can get to theirs, but they have muskets and calvs already. You may have the tech, but no saltpetter remember?
Oh the pain
Comment
-
This is where being a good Machiavellian pays off. Whether it's a permanent situation (you only want to trade for it but don't really want to conquer the resource) or as a way to allow yourself to build an army of conquest, finding out what a supplier lacks can be helpful.
It reduces your gpt costs of doing business, if you can throw in a luxury or a resource of your own into the deal. Sometimes, it even pays to go to war to nab a resouce/luxury you don't really need but your supplier needs. This can create profitable long term dependencies that can keep an important ally out of all future MAs against you.AI:C3C Debug Game Report (Part1) :C3C Debug Game Report (Part2)
Strategy:The Machiavellian Doctrine
Visit my WebsiteMonkey Dew
Comment
Comment