I've gone through entire games without horses. I could do without uranium as well depending on how close I am to winning.
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Saltpeter is soooooooo very important!
Collapse
X
-
"And so, my fellow Americans: ask not what your country can do for you—ask what you can do for your country. My fellow citizens of the world: ask not what America will do for you, but what together we can do for the freedom of man." -- JFK Inaugural, 1961
"Extremism in the defense of liberty is not a vice." -- Barry Goldwater, 1964 GOP Nomination acceptance speech (not George W. Bush 40 years later...)
2004 Presidential Candidate
2008 Presidential Candidate (for what its worth)
-
That sounds good, but is not always pratical. Say you need saltpetter and none iis on your contient. You can get to theirs yet, now what.Originally posted by chegitz guevara
If I don't have a resource I need I take it.
Maybe you can get to theirs, but they have muskets and calvs already. You may have the tech, but no saltpetter remember?
Oh the pain
Comment
-
This is where being a good Machiavellian pays off. Whether it's a permanent situation (you only want to trade for it but don't really want to conquer the resource) or as a way to allow yourself to build an army of conquest, finding out what a supplier lacks can be helpful.
It reduces your gpt costs of doing business, if you can throw in a luxury or a resource of your own into the deal. Sometimes, it even pays to go to war to nab a resouce/luxury you don't really need but your supplier needs. This can create profitable long term dependencies that can keep an important ally out of all future MAs against you.AI:C3C Debug Game Report (Part1) :C3C Debug Game Report (Part2)
Strategy:The Machiavellian Doctrine
Visit my WebsiteMonkey Dew
Comment
Comment