The greatest Civ game

[XarXo]

I can understand CtP2, but who can vote Crap to Power I?

[srholmes]

i play civ 2 mge now, but i voted for civ 1 as it was an inspired, groundbreaking, genre-defining game .......

[SCG]

those who know me from the Civ 2 forum, know i can really get into micromanaging I've tried CtP II, but find the PW rather annoying. Civ I was really groundbreaking and almost voted for it as i think i may still have more hrs logged in Civ I than i do Civ II, but in the end chose Civ II (MGE by default), as there is so much more that can be done in Civ II than Civ I.

[Dauphin]

I haven't played Civ2 in ages, but the WW2 Europe scenario was great.

I have't looked, but are there any good WW2 scenarios for Civ3?

[Boris Godunov]

Originally posted by Big Crunch
I haven't played Civ2 in ages, but the WW2 Europe scenario was great.

I have't looked, but are there any good WW2 scenarios for Civ3?

It is practically impossible to make a WW2 scenario--or any historical scenario, for that matter--in Civ3 as it stands, since you can't set diplomatic relations in the scenario editor

[/standard gripe]

[atawa]

Civ 2, although I never played CTP so I couldnt comment on that.

[ColdWizard]

Originally posted by Henrik
Civ 2 MGE is leading

as it should be

[Henrik]

Indeed, I yet have to find anything better

[georges bonbon]

Civ III because of the best AI.

[badams52]

I voted civ III, but it seems that there are many more people who posted their praise for civ II MGE than civ III even though the vote is quote close. I wonder what this says. Anyway...

I prefer civ III for:

• Luxuries
• Much, Much improved AI
• Bombardment
• Better Trade
• Gold supporting units and settlers/workers require no food
• Worker units
• Selling/trading cities
• Challenges when wonder bullding
• Resources appear later (more realistic)
• Stacking units
• Borders!!!
• Better diplomacy

Well, that's enough for now.

[nationalist]

Civ 3. I must have played Civ 2 every day for 3 years, but as soon as I got Civ 3 I never touched Civ 2 again. I love the idea of culture, I love the borders, I love the fact that different civs are actually different, I love the UUs, I love the improved graphics, I love the fact that you can raze cities, capture workers and artillery, I love the fact that you can't conquer the world with a Howitzer army, I love bombardment, I love that your whole stack doesn't die with one loss, I love that computer civs can't sneak a settler two squares from your capital and found new city, I love the updated AI, I love the new trading system, I love the fact that there are no superpowerful caravans/spies/ Fundamentalist government.....

I loved Civ 2 in its time, but I think that Civ 3 PTW is far superior. I will personally never go back to Civ 2.

[GePap]

Civ 2 (never had MGE, why wasn't normal civ 2 included in the poll?) was the best, due to the ability ot make great scenerios. Red front is a classic.

Civ 3 certainly has several imporvements, but honetly, i would have been happy if Civ 3 had just been AC reworked to fit an earth setting: too many of Ac's better ideas were ignored.

[Rasbelin]

Civ II MGE is more competitive than Civ II.

[Panag]

hi ,

, civ 2 MP gold still leads , followed closely by civ 3 , .....

so that means that the other games are not looked at as true civ games , ..........

have a nice day

[Rasbelin]

I find it rather amusing that CivNet has one vote.