Originally posted by Locutus
As someone who's worked on both (in both cases in a very minor way), I unfortunately have to tell you it's not.
The CtP2 scenario was a truely amazing piece of work (apart from a few glaring bugs -- as the rest of the game it was released before it was done), very few people could come up with something great like that. It raised the bar for scenarios on this topic almost impossibly high.
Harlan (who designed the CtP2 scenario) was a genius. I don't wanna say anything bad about the guy who designed the Civ4 scenario, but he's not Harlan. You can't expect the same standard of work from someone who's less genius and had less time.
I'm not saying it's a bad scenario (not commenting on that, you'll have to find that out for yourself), but I wouldn't want you to get your hopes up unreasonably high -- you'd only setting yourself up for a dissappointment no matter how good this scenario might be.
As someone who's worked on both (in both cases in a very minor way), I unfortunately have to tell you it's not.
The CtP2 scenario was a truely amazing piece of work (apart from a few glaring bugs -- as the rest of the game it was released before it was done), very few people could come up with something great like that. It raised the bar for scenarios on this topic almost impossibly high.
Harlan (who designed the CtP2 scenario) was a genius. I don't wanna say anything bad about the guy who designed the Civ4 scenario, but he's not Harlan. You can't expect the same standard of work from someone who's less genius and had less time.
I'm not saying it's a bad scenario (not commenting on that, you'll have to find that out for yourself), but I wouldn't want you to get your hopes up unreasonably high -- you'd only setting yourself up for a dissappointment no matter how good this scenario might be.

Comment