Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

A Mesopotamian Civ

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #31
    I think that was his point, that Persia is in and that he doesn't want any more in. Am I right wardhali?
    Do not fear, for I am with you; Do not anxiously look about you, for I am your God.-Isaiah 41:10
    I praise you because I am fearfully and wonderfully made - Psalms 139.14a
    Also active on WePlayCiv.

    Comment


    • #32
      Persia isn't Mesopotamian, they're Iranian.
      Beer is proof that God loves you and wants you to be happy - Ben Franklin

      Comment


      • #33
        They did own a good bit of Mesopotamia for a while you know. And gamewise, it isn't much place in the Middle East and sorroundings as it is.
        Do not fear, for I am with you; Do not anxiously look about you, for I am your God.-Isaiah 41:10
        I praise you because I am fearfully and wonderfully made - Psalms 139.14a
        Also active on WePlayCiv.

        Comment


        • #34
          Originally posted by Alexander01


          Um, Persia is in the game...


          ... *backs away slowly*... ... ... ...

          Comment


          • #35
            Originally posted by Nikolai
            They did own a good bit of Mesopotamia for a while you know. And gamewise, it isn't much place in the Middle East and sorroundings as it is.
            So did Macedonia. I wouldn't consider them mesopotamian. Mesopotamia is known as the Cradle of Civilization. Civilization flurished there when Persia was insignificant. Great empires were created along with great monuments. Those who followed tried to surpass those that came before, but that's why they have the advantage of following. If we just count those who followed, we could narrow it to a handful of civs that simply did better than those before. But, instead, the game tries to represent a great many who made significant achievement. That's why Persia and Greece are in the game, along with Rome, and, in the previous games, Babylon (to represent the cradle of civilization).
            Beer is proof that God loves you and wants you to be happy - Ben Franklin

            Comment


            • #36
              Originally posted by Louis XXIV


              So did Macedonia. I wouldn't consider them mesopotamian. Mesopotamia is known as the Cradle of Civilization. Civilization flurished there when Persia was insignificant. Great empires were created along with great monuments. Those who followed tried to surpass those that came before, but that's why they have the advantage of following. If we just count those who followed, we could narrow it to a handful of civs that simply did better than those before. But, instead, the game tries to represent a great many who made significant achievement. That's why Persia and Greece are in the game, along with Rome, and, in the previous games, Babylon (to represent the cradle of civilization).
              I concur. I view Mesopotamia as crucially important aspect of global civilization that is currently neglected in Civ4. While I feel that Babylon is the best representative, I'd really be satisfied with Sumer or Assyria, just so long as we don't forget the cradle of Civ.
              The Apolytoner formerly known as Alexander01
              "God has given no greater spur to victory than contempt of death." - Hannibal Barca, c. 218 B.C.
              "We can legislate until doomsday but that will not make men righteous." - George Albert Smith, A.D. 1949
              The Kingdom of Jerusalem: Chronicles of the Golden Cross - a Crusader Kings After Action Report

              Comment


              • #37
                Yosho
                Exactly how I feel.

                The point I was making was: pick either Sumer or Babylon, not both. They're baically the same civilization with different centres of power at different points of time. It would be like having each of the dynasties of China represented instead of just having China.

                Not that I'm totally against having both. Just when there are so many civs to choose from, I don't see the point in having ancient Mesopotamia represented twice. (Ditto for Rome/Byzantium.)


                But to get back on topic, don't people think of Babylon before Sumer because Babylon is mentioned in the Bible? People who have heard Bible stories would have heard about Babylon at one point or another, even if they've never heard of Hammurabi and his laws.
                "Every time I have to make a tough decision, I ask myself, 'What would Tom Cruise do?' Then I jump up and down on the couch." - Neil Strauss

                Comment


                • #38
                  Probably. But that's true of Assyria as well. They were extremely powerful militarily so, among other things, they conquered Israel. But, because they conquered Israel, they are known. Nineveh was a great city full of culture, but its location was discovered because locals in the area referred to it as "Jonah's city".
                  Beer is proof that God loves you and wants you to be happy - Ben Franklin

                  Comment


                  • #39
                    Originally posted by Louis XXIV
                    Probably. But that's true of Assyria as well. They were extremely powerful militarily so, among other things, they conquered Israel. But, because they conquered Israel, they are known. Nineveh was a great city full of culture, but its location was discovered because locals in the area referred to it as "Jonah's city".
                    And that leads to further discussion of why the Hebrews should be in the game (cultural impact). But that belongs in another thread.
                    The Apolytoner formerly known as Alexander01
                    "God has given no greater spur to victory than contempt of death." - Hannibal Barca, c. 218 B.C.
                    "We can legislate until doomsday but that will not make men righteous." - George Albert Smith, A.D. 1949
                    The Kingdom of Jerusalem: Chronicles of the Golden Cross - a Crusader Kings After Action Report

                    Comment


                    • #40
                      Babylon, Assyria, and the Hittites all belong in the game. Leads to the question: Do most of us expect one more expansion even as we wait for this one? Really belongs in another thread, saw one related to this a while back.
                      No matter where you go, there you are. - Buckaroo Banzai
                      "I played it [Civilization] for three months and then realised I hadn't done any work. In the end, I had to delete all the saved files and smash the CD." Iain Banks, author

                      Comment


                      • #41
                        Originally posted by Blaupanzer
                        Leads to the question: Do most of us expect one more expansion even as we wait for this one?
                        Absolutely.
                        The Apolytoner formerly known as Alexander01
                        "God has given no greater spur to victory than contempt of death." - Hannibal Barca, c. 218 B.C.
                        "We can legislate until doomsday but that will not make men righteous." - George Albert Smith, A.D. 1949
                        The Kingdom of Jerusalem: Chronicles of the Golden Cross - a Crusader Kings After Action Report

                        Comment


                        • #42
                          The Babylonians were always my favorite civilization to play as. And the Hanging Gardens have always been my favorite wonder.

                          I miss bringing glory to ol' Babylon dearly...

                          Comment

                          Working...
                          X