So, I know this might be a silly thing to get upset about, but I hate the fact that they don't have more female leaders. Every civilization should have a male and female option. Can't they use historical women as leaders, like Susan B. Anthony for America? On top of it they removed Joan of Arc. Come on! I'm sure they could dig up some women!
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Not many women...
Collapse
X
-
Old discussion.
Comment
-
Can't they use historical women as leaders, like Susan B. Anthony for America?
If you hadn't noticed, the US has never had a female President, and I doubt Anthony would have been considered a female leader .
I'm glad at the change. It was ahistorical to have a male and female for every civ. Hell, Joan of Arc was merely a General (she fought for the 'leader' of France, the Dauphan).“I give you a new commandment, that you love one another. Just as I have loved you, you also should love one another. By this everyone will know that you are my disciples, if you have love for one another.”
- John 13:34-35 (NRSV)
Comment
-
Just to be awkward, I'd have preferred Winston Churchill to Queen Victoria for England. One Queen is enoughTo doubt everything or to believe everything are two equally convenient solutions; both dispense with the necessity of reflection.
H.Poincaré
Comment
-
Originally posted by Jon Miller
I Actually know more girls who play Civ...THEY!!111 OMG WTF LOL LET DA NOMADS AND TEH S3D3NTARY PEOPLA BOTH MAEK BITER AXP3REINCES
AND TEH GRAAT SINS OF THERE [DOCTRINAL] INOVATIONS BQU3ATH3D SMAL
AND!!1!11!!! LOL JUST IN CAES A DISPUTANT CALS U 2 DISPUT3 ABOUT THEYRE CLAMES
DO NOT THAN DISPUT3 ON THEM 3XCAPT BY WAY OF AN 3XTARNAL DISPUTA!!!!11!! WTF
Comment
Comment