The Spearman vs. Tank thing is more of a gameplay issue, not a realism issue.
In the Modern Age, many players, myself included, would consider the Spearman unit to represent not guys with crude metal armor and actual spears, but instead a poorly armed rebel group. Still, it's not good for gameplay if you lose units like that too often.
In the real life, technology makes even more difference. There's not just "Tanks", "Infantry" and such stuff. An Abrams or a Merkava are far superior to a Churchill or a Panther, just like a F-16 is far superior to a Fokker. In the game, the difference between these units isn't as huge. If you compare the poorest armies in the world with the best ones, you'll find that the tech gap is less than what it can conceivably be in Civ.
In the Modern Age, many players, myself included, would consider the Spearman unit to represent not guys with crude metal armor and actual spears, but instead a poorly armed rebel group. Still, it's not good for gameplay if you lose units like that too often.
In the real life, technology makes even more difference. There's not just "Tanks", "Infantry" and such stuff. An Abrams or a Merkava are far superior to a Churchill or a Panther, just like a F-16 is far superior to a Fokker. In the game, the difference between these units isn't as huge. If you compare the poorest armies in the world with the best ones, you'll find that the tech gap is less than what it can conceivably be in Civ.
Comment