The Altera Centauri collection has been brought up to date by Darsnan. It comprises every decent scenario he's been able to find anywhere on the web, going back over 20 years.
25 themes/skins/styles are now available to members. Check the select drop-down at the bottom-left of each page.
Call To Power 2 Cradle 3+ mod in progress: https://apolyton.net/forum/other-games/call-to-power-2/ctp2-creation/9437883-making-cradle-3-fully-compatible-with-the-apolyton-edition
Turks are the closest thing they have in RoN...
I would like to see a Persian civ (not arab again) but would be good for the ancient ages
I suppose a Saracen civ like in AOK would be good.
Originally posted by Sirotnikov
Oy
I feel a new discussionabout hebrew / israeli civ coming on
I will not touch it with a ten foot pole.
However, I will say that the U.S. should not be in Rise of Nations. This is a game about starting out as an ancient tribe. The U.S. has nothing like that - no logical procession to today from ancient times. I would vote no on adding the U.S.
About 24,000 people die every day from hunger or hunger-related causes. With a simple click daily at the Hunger Site you can provide food for those who need it.
ya well the turks have always wanted to be a part of europe rather then the middle east...but the historical fact of the matter is that they are a muslim country, and I think old europe still has a bit of a prejudice against them for that. But i think its a mistake to do that, here is a democratic secular muslim state, something that the western powers want to see in the rest of the middle east. If they arent even at least given a bone for playing the game the way we want, it just isnt fair, nor advantages for us, and send a wrong message to them and other Muslim countries who are moderates.
Originally posted by One_Dead_Villy
ya well the turks have always wanted to be a part of europe rather then the middle east...but the historical fact of the matter is that they are a muslim country, and I think old europe still has a bit of a prejudice against them for that. But i think its a mistake to do that, here is a democratic secular muslim state, something that the western powers want to see in the rest of the middle east. If they arent even at least given a bone for playing the game the way we want, it just isnt fair, nor advantages for us, and send a wrong message to them and other Muslim countries who are moderates.
I don't think the time is quite right to label Turkey a democratic secular state. If it wasn't for the army, the fragile Turkish infrastructure would probably collapse. The current government is an Islamic one, and the people continue to show a strong anti-western sentiment. Certainly the country's strong relationship with America may be one of the reasons the major countries in the EU appear to be resentful of the Turks.
well...ya that too
but you can say that the current U.S. or European governments a Christian government as well, especially the current U.S. administration's penchant to invoke God, and promote faith based initiative in social programs. The important distinction is that they are in power while it is back by military to create stability. There is at least nominal nod to the separation of church and state, and they do have elections which arent just confirming the same dictator into power, and arent rules by Mullahs or Ayatolahs.
as a Canadian, i am sure you know WE like to have our own little digs at the States as well. i wouldnt catagorize the Turkish state by public sentiments (especially in this climate of war).
Yeah, anti-americanism seems to be a fast growing trend these days. Even so, the Turkish democracy is on thin ice imo. I know torture is still a widely accepted practice, and various international organizations have slammed the Turks for additional human rights abuses.
Concrete, Abstract, or Squoingy? "I don't believe in giving scripting languages because the only additional power they give users is the power to create bugs." - Mike Breitkreutz, Firaxis
Concrete, Abstract, or Squoingy? "I don't believe in giving scripting languages because the only additional power they give users is the power to create bugs." - Mike Breitkreutz, Firaxis
However, I will say that the U.S. should not be in Rise of Nations. This is a game about starting out as an ancient tribe. The U.S. has nothing like that - no logical procession to today from ancient times. I would vote no on adding the U.S.
In that spirit there should be a levantine semites civ - that would cover Hebrews, Phoenicians, etc. AOE/ROR added Carthaginians when AOE already had Phoenicians!!!!!
"A person cannot approach the divine by reaching beyond the human. To become human, is what this individual person, has been created for.” Martin Buber
Comment