Tweet
Although the Activision Blizzard name is not interesting.
-
While there might be a physics engine that applies to the jugs, I doubt that an entire engine was written specifically for the funbags. - Cyclotron - debating the pressing issue of boobies in games. -
Long story short: EA killed it.Originally posted by vee4473
What happened to Westwood? I forgot.Comment
-
What about
ActiveBlizzard or BlizzardVisionbe freeComment
-
Ah yes, I only ask because I remember the days of warcraft and C&C and the westwood/blizzard logos made me happy.Originally posted by vovan
Long story short: EA killed it.
Not sure what i'm trying to say...but maybe you get it.While there might be a physics engine that applies to the jugs, I doubt that an entire engine was written specifically for the funbags. - Cyclotron - debating the pressing issue of boobies in games.Comment
-
What I can't figure out is how Blizzard doesn't own the world. I haven't done the math, but 10 million subscribers has to be raking in an ungodly amount of cash.Comment
-
Yeah, but I think this situation is different. Blizzard is a stronger company now than Westwood was back then (98? something like that). Also, Blizzard is a part of a big company already (Vivendi), whereas I think Westwood wasn't. So I really don't think much is going to change for Blizzard -- they just won't have to support Vivendi's other losses any more. Then again, maybe I am entirely misguided, but I would at least like to think this is what's going on.Originally posted by vee4473
Not sure what i'm trying to say...but maybe you get it.Comment
-
How about Blizzard.Originally posted by FrostyBoy
What about
ActiveBlizzard or BlizzardVision
Then, on page 134 of the small print it can say affiliated with Activision.
It's win/win.
Comment
-
Its like when the Union Pacific merged with the Missouri Pacific. To get the name of the new railroad, they took the Union, from Union Pacific, and the Pacific, from Missouric PacificOriginally posted by DrSpike
How about Blizzard.
"A person cannot approach the divine by reaching beyond the human. To become human, is what this individual person, has been created for.” Martin BuberComment
-
Missouri Pacific seems a bit of an oxymoron
Comment
-
So is Activision Blizzard.
Comment
-
Instead they will support Activisions losses.Originally posted by vovan
Yeah, but I think this situation is different. Blizzard is a stronger company now than Westwood was back then (98? something like that). Also, Blizzard is a part of a big company already (Vivendi), whereas I think Westwood wasn't. So I really don't think much is going to change for Blizzard -- they just won't have to support Vivendi's other losses any more. Then again, maybe I am entirely misguided, but I would at least like to think this is what's going on.
JMJon Miller-
I AM.CANADIAN
GENERATION 35: The first time you see this, copy it into your sig on any forum and add 1 to the generation. Social experiment.Comment
-
No more so than the Chesapeake and Ohio, say.Originally posted by Kuciwalker
Missouri Pacific seems a bit of an oxymoron
"A person cannot approach the divine by reaching beyond the human. To become human, is what this individual person, has been created for.” Martin BuberComment
-
I read "affiliated" as "afflicted". Strangely appropriate, now that I think about it.Originally posted by DrSpike
Then, on page 134 of the small print it can say affiliated with Activision.
I'm building a wagon! On some other part of the internets, obviously (but not that other site).Comment
-
How's that? It went from Missouri to the Pacific (I think)... a lot of train lines got their name from their destination(s).Originally posted by Kuciwalker
Missouri Pacific seems a bit of an oxymoron
<Reverend> IRC is just multiplayer notepad.
I like your SNOOPY POSTER! - While you Wait quote.Comment
-
Umm... Activision has consistently made money for the past three years (maybe more, but 3 years worth of data is what yahoo finance is showing).Originally posted by Jon Miller
Instead they will support Activisions losses.Comment
Comment