I disagree, 4 looks extremely cluttered, my order of preference goes 3, 1, 2, 4 from most to least based on the screenshots.
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Heroes of Might and Magic 5
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by DrSpike
You can't really do that now - your statements earlier were absolute statements not statements about graphics relative to the standards of the day.
I agree 1 and 2 were nice for their time, but that's not the point, and not what you claimed. 4 looks better than 1 period, and you can't credibly claim otherwise.Rethink Refuse Reduce Reuse
Do It Ourselves
Comment
-
Originally posted by Urban Ranger
HoMM 4 definitely looks... strange. It doesn't look actually bad, but the various elements just don't fit together.Do not fear, for I am with you; Do not anxiously look about you, for I am your God.-Isaiah 41:10
I praise you because I am fearfully and wonderfully made - Psalms 139.14a
Also active on WePlayCiv.
Comment
-
My main beef with HOMM4 (aside from the pathetic AI) was that you acquired a ton of useless, or mostly useless, crap (magic) and had no way of getting rid of it safely- HOMM3 at least had the sacrifical altar.
HOMM3 was the best in the series.I'm consitently stupid- Japher
I think that opinion in the United States is decidedly different from the rest of the world because we have a free press -- by free, I mean a virgorously presented right wing point of view on the air and available to all.- Ned
Comment
-
It is evident nobody of you guys played any MP. Heroes AI is useless and to experience heroes games fully you had to play against other humans. Heroes 2 was the best MP you could get because of speed mostly, but heroes 3 and 4 added some flavour and twist. I played them all in MP and can't really decide which one I like more, not taking the speed into account.
Also, for SP, there are custom campaigns and scenarios which mostly compensate for the poor AI with bonuses and these campaigns and scenarios are best in Heroes 4.
As for the graphics, I agree that from the game play point of view Heroes 2 have the best graphics. But it is usually the case that animation brings nothing to the game play (like civ2 compared to civ3) and just drains resources which slows up the game.
Comment
-
Originally posted by DrSpike
Let's be honest though, you are strange.
IIRC this game qualifies under your rules as a 'shooter'.
-
On another subject, I'll repeat--> Honestly, shooters are the only games that should have 3D. (fable, etc.) so I once again, repeat a slight fear for HoMM V since only in combat is it really supposed to be a shooter.
-
by the way, did anyone notice this was Dan's first post since 2002? amazing... it's quite obvious that Civ IV's well in the works to completion if Dan's back perusing the boards-->Visit CGN!
-->"Production! More Production! Production creates Wealth! Production creates more Jobs!"-Wendell Willkie -1944
Comment
-
Hmm... "Pirates!" is long-since finished- so are you working on the new upcoming game that is to be decided by the poll on your site? Or something completely different?
Just wondering...-->Visit CGN!
-->"Production! More Production! Production creates Wealth! Production creates more Jobs!"-Wendell Willkie -1944
Comment
Comment