FG: Nuclear War XX: "The Final Frontier"

[Jamski]

Sent, you little beggar you!

Oh, and HUMBUG!

-Jam

[Jonny]

Sent.

[Tassadar500]

Sent.

[Atragon]

belated sent.

[DrSpike]

Sent, I think.

[Skanky Burns]

Orders dispatched forthwith!

[self biased]

orders sent.

[Whoha]

anyway next game Lets see if I can get wiped out on turn 1.

[Kassiopeia]

This does raise the question: why sign up for the game at all?

[Tassadar500]

Grudges aren't the smartest thing for Nuclear War of all games.

[Sparrowhawk]

I think this game needs more Whoha's and Vlad's....and Kuciwalkers. As seen last game, when they are eliminated too early those left go with the builder strategy, which while it might be a smarter strategy, makes for a more boring game for those of us reading the thread, and a longer game at that.

to Whoha for attacking.....and then attacking again.

[Kassiopeia]

Thing is, builder strategy, as much as it's loathed, is a good strategy... "the only way to win Global Thermonuclear War is to not play at all." It allows you to weather the stormy initial turns until it's time to get messy.

[Kuciwalker]

Originally posted by Sparrowhawk
I think this game needs more Whoha's and Vlad's....and Kuciwalkers.

Huh? I haven't done anything aggressive.

[Sparrowhawk]

Not yet, but past precedent suggests you will.....eventually, and sooner then the "builders".

And Kassiopeia, I agree with you completely, but you asked Whoha why play at all, and I answered that question with the point that if we loose the early attackers the game become much more boring. If you know you arn't going to get attacked, it changes the game strategy quite a bit.

[Kassiopeia]

Yes yes, but why play at all if you yourself want to get annihilated on turn 1? Where's the point?