Announcement

**WesW** · July 28, 2000, 10:34

SDI should now be available with Superconductor. I had forgotten to edit the improvement text to reflect this. Thanks for the info.

The B17 replaces the B52 for the Med mod 4. It's just the way the units occur in the timeline. The B52 would look funny coming out with the WWII-era units, and there isn't enough space in the timeline to squeeze it in between Aerodynamics and Adv. Composites.
If you want it in, you can delete the can't_build line in the units text entry, and adjust its values to suit you.
Paul has been checking the units text against the values in the Med charts spreadsheets, and found quite a number of errors. The only major ones were for the Helicopter, which I had not adjusted at all for the mod.
John (Discovery One) has told me that he will not be able to write up any more historical gls for the mod. This leaves the ones for advances, improvements and units undone. The only ones that bother me are the units. I had planned on doing them myself if need be, but I am tied up with schoolwork right now, and don't know when I can get to them. If anyone wants to volunteer to do those, I would be grateful.

I am just getting to the place in my game where you get the wonders that you reported problems with. I am building the Master Race now. I will report on what happens.

Btw everyone, Subs are a force in the game now. I sunk a Dreadnought with a U-boat, though barely. The AIs will be building them too, so you had better have some Destroyers in with your capital ships.

Finally, how is the timeline flowing in your games? It's a little fast in mine, and I am thinking about reducing the gold coefficient for governments by 10%. CD lowered it by 10% for his mod, but with the new trade goods things seem to be going too fast again. I am also piling up a little too much money as well, so this change would help with that too. The leading AIs are ahead of me tech-wise in my game, so they are piling it up as well, I assume.

**Martock** · July 28, 2000, 15:05

Though i certainly agree that the B52 would be funny looking if it came out with the WWII units, at the same time it's just as bizarre going from a B17 to a B2 stealth bomber. perhaps we could tweak it that the B52 comes between the B17 and B2 but leave the B17 as strictly a bomber (aka remove it's ability to carry nukes) and have the B52 retain it's ability to carry nukes. at the same time, make the costs and perhaps abilities of the B17 less than it is now. essentially make the B17 a cheap bomber, the B52 a heavy bomber with the ability to drop nukes, and the B2 Stealth just a better version of the B52.

just a quick question, can someone refresh my memory on how to make the map size bigger. i know it was simple to do but i forgot how to do it.

**WesW** · July 29, 2000, 00:22

I guess we can make this the new thread for discussing the Med mod 4 until the Public Release is made.
Myself, I am still about where I was before in my game. It's very enjoyable, but each turn takes about 20 min. now. I am way ahead in the timeline, and each advance only takes about 2 turns, which is much faster than I planned on. I also have a much larger empire than I usually do, but the lead AIs are still keeping ahead of me tech-wise, so I think something needs to be done.

Martock, I remember you stating in the Intro thread that the AIs were not building any farms. With all the problems that you have listed, I wonder if there is not something wrong in your setup somewhere. I would suggest you go through the Intro and Install readme again, and also read the file descriptions on my webpage to make sure you have everything installed correctly.

Btw, I have had my IExplorer and Outlook Express go down on me permanently, so I have had to get Netscape and its accompanying email program. I imported my address book from Outlook Express, but I haven't tested it out yet.
The Netscape stuff appears to be working fine, so I hope that everything will transition smoothly. However, if you have trouble sending me mail, or don't get a reply within a few days, post here and ask me if I got it.

I am making notes of changes to make in the mod, but I want to go farther in my current game before making major adjustments. I want to make all the changes needed, and get all the values for the units, etc. matched up with the Charts before posting the next beta.
Paul has set himself up as the quality control inspector for the mod, something which was badly needed, so hopefully what you read in the Charts, gls etc. will be what you get by the time this thing is formally released.
I am really bogged down with schoolwork right now, so it will probably be a week or so before this next beta gets put out.

I would like to get somemore reports on how peoples games are going. Mostly how the timeline is flowing, gold and time to discover advances.
I am also looking for a volunteer to write up historical gls for the new units. Any WWII enthusiasts out there who want to do something enjoyable? Believe me, it's fun writing these things when they are on a subject you like.

Martock, I will take a look at re-doing the bombers. I never liked taking the B52 out of the game, I just never had that moment of inspiration on how to arrange things. I may be on to something now due to your suggestions. I will report on it when I have my thoughts settled.

**Martock** · July 29, 2000, 09:35

Wes,

i restarted my game the other day and am almost at the point in time where i'll soon be able to build the master race wonder that i had problems with before. i'll let u know if this issue crops up again.

in this new game the computer is building farms so i don't think that's a problem anymore. i've also noticed one other thing... there are boats EVERYWHERE...i can't sail outta my port without bumping into one of them...i've seen a couple of stacks of 4-5 old triemes and a few stacks of carvels and gallons...while scanning thru this game to make sure the computer was building farms (i was on a island of my own) i even saw several stacks of 9 land units in this case the leading unit was calvary. it seems the computer is more content to build large stacks of stuff now. i'm rather happy with that.

wes, what happend with movement though?? prior to med 4 my horse archers could move 2 spaces thru forests and the later version (i forgot what they were called) could go about 3 or for spaces in forest...now, they can't. i found that space movement very useful for early exploration...did you change them on purpose or by accident?

as for me, gold seems to be flowing rather nicely but having lots of trade routes and with buildings that produce gold, that will happen. the advances seem to go ok.

i have noticed something odd (but since i have yet to finish a game using Med 4 i'm not sure how true this is) but almost every computer opponent i meet in this game loves me...it maybe due to the wonders though since a few do have that affect but darn, it's hard being a jerk in this game i'm playing now...it's been a long time since i have been able to trade with nations of the world and NOT have all my routes pirated.

well enough for now. i'll restart my game again tonight (as i want to actually build a map) and see how it goes again.

**Milkman** · July 29, 2000, 14:56

Have played twice with new med mod 4.0, on easier levels to check out changes, get used to new stuff. I have noticed civ's in 1 game almost all religious/friendly. In 2nd game all were slaver/aggressive. Have been playing with 8 civ's on large map. 1st game easy. 2nd game deity.

Cannot recall seeing this happen in Med Mod 3.0 but will play a game with 3.0 and double check.

WesW and all who helped put the Med Mod's together. The effort spent is very much appreciated. Has anyone ever tried modifying the wonder movies? Looked for programs to create/modify avi files, but no luck yet. Can't help much with other stuff in mod but noticed that had not been done much yet. Probably be something simple like changing text at end of movie to reflect actual changes for new wonders. Again many thanks to everyone for putting this mod out.

**Milkman** · July 29, 2000, 16:22

Scratch the part about editing avi files. Found a few editors. Quickly realized i need a whole lot more processor power than i have now. Guess it really is time to upgrade my 200mhz.

**hexagonian** · July 29, 2000, 16:47

Still playing the MedMod, so I don't know how much of this will help, but the ModernMod is an extension of the timeline for the MedMod...

Just reached the 1700s and I am researching Electronics.

All the civs hate me, though its probably because whenever one of them pirated my trade routes, I have the tendency to take it personally - but even civs that haven't pirated me still do not like me.

As a side note, my last game (pre-Mod), I was able to get most of the civs to get an alliance with me.

My opinion is that there is too much gold in the game, though reducing trade goods or the gold settings is a partial solution - but it will effect everyone.

Science-wise, I'm in the lead, but two other civs are close, based on what I can gift them. They may have a couple of advances that I am not aware of.

Happiness is an ongoing issue, due to empire size and war discontent - but I do prefer that setting (thanks to CD).

However, I find that I have the luxury of building lots of stuff with the mines in forests, so its an easily-handled situation. There was a suggestion to increase happiness improvement costs, but how much emphasis does the AI place on maintaining happiness? If it is a high priority, then that would further cripple the AI, at the cost of military and other improvements that help in a tangible way.

I also think that my lead on the powergraph is due to a large military, because of increased production. I haven't seen too many stacks, but that is because I cleared off my continent of rivals. Currently, I'm taking the offensive to another civ, and am on the verge of eliminating it. I'm saving the strong opponents for later - I want to see if they have the military to repel me, and I figure that I will give them time to build.

I do not build any more mines, since I think it unbalances the game, since the AI doesn't build them. Very tempting though in the early game, because it does jump start your economy. Maybe an increase in price for them would be in order.

As for military, the problem still remains for me that it isn't too difficult to take cities, or hold the ones I have - but my style is the same as Wes (build infrastructure/production, defense, then offense), so when I do go on the offensive, I hit and hit hard. Add to the fact that the AI doesn't seem to be able to maintain a prolonged amphibeous assault and the outcome isn't in doubt. But the naval aspect is 100% better, and I like the fact that I have to maintain a large navy. I'm constantly being harrassed by ships with bombards and piracy, but I do like that now. It's the price to pay for leading the game, I figure. After all, the object is to win, not be buddy-buddy with everyone.

My experience is based on a single game though - conditions vary based on what happens in the early game. And I am on Emperor, so Deity will be more difficult.

My feeling is the same as in the past. Getting to the point of being able to overun the AI opponent is the real challenge in CTP - but I do enjoy getting to that point. From what I see in other games, (such as SMAC) the same problem exists.

There are a whole host of variables to take into account - that much is for sure!!

All in all, it is much more enjoyable!!

**BigJ** · July 29, 2000, 17:54

Hey guys,
The current game I am playing with the modern mod just reached the point that a couple of the wonders that can't be built are available. I tried to build ghandi's thing, and the ai tried to build master race, and neither of them got built. I'm not sure I want to try ford's assembly thing which just became available, its to depressing not to be able to build these modern wonders. Just a thought- could it be the number of wonders that is causing a problem? I guess a little later I will start another game and use the cheat mode to check this out. Arrggghhh- the game I am playing is so good!
Another thought- I am all for the B52 being put back in, I like it.

BigJ

**hexagonian** · July 29, 2000, 20:29

Another question for all who have played the game with the Medieval/Modern Mod...

What global settings do you find to offer the most interesting game

World size
Trade Goods (Many-Few, Uniform-Diverse)
Wet-Dry
Warm-Cold
Continents-Islands
Ocean-Land

I'm interested in hearing input on this, as it might offer some differences in the level of challenges within the game. In my current game I had one other civ on my continent, and I took it out fairly quickly. One civ did manage to land a stack of 6 units on my continent and it took a city - however, the city was back in my hands within a couple of turns.

**BigJ** · July 29, 2000, 21:47

Well, kinda bad news, I guess.....
I got busy with the wonders.txt and the cheat mode, and I think I figured something out. In the wonders.txt, none of the wonders after equal rights can be built. I then took out three wonders before equal rights, and then I could build the three after it, suggesting that it is the number of wonders that is the problem. If I counted right it is a limit of 64, meaning that 13 of the current ones need to be taken out (oh, what fun). I was really in a hurry when I did this, so if anyone else could confirm it that would help.

BigJ

**Martock** · July 29, 2000, 22:04

thanks very much for vindicating me BigJ as i was beginning to think my system went bonkers and i was dreading the thought of yet another install.

there is one small catch though...i did in my original game get to the point of building wonders AFTER the equal rights act BUT these were the wonders from the game...aka the original ones. so the wonders here that are affected are strictly limited to the new ones in this version. i'm sure there is a way to increase the amount of wonders...but it would bite if that was the actual limit...it's good to know at least you figured out the reasoning behind it.

**BigJ** · July 29, 2000, 22:49

I think what goes on is that the first 64 wonders in wonders.txt work, and any after that don't. So wonders after equal rights in the game, the original ones, are still before equal rights in the wonders.txt, so they are not affected.

AAAArrrgggghhhh....... I tried to take out one wonder before equal rights that was already built to see if my great saved game could continue, but alas, as far as I know it cannot if I want the new wonders. When I tried this I had the romans try to build ghandis thingy. I am playing a hotseat game with 3 humans (I play them all, as I give myself a good challenge, hehe) and 5 ai's. Anyway, the romans were the first player, and when I ended the turn, the egyptians, the second player, were skipped, and it was the greeks turn (third player). What happened was that the egyptians had mao's book and of course had their wgf sliders maxed out, and all the cities revolted. I checked some greek cities, and they had wonders that they shouldn't have had, including mao's book. I guess taking wonders out of wonders.txt and loading a saved game gets who has what wonder all screwed up. And it was such a good game..... I guess I will keep it just in case someone figures out how to increase the number of wonders or something, if that is indeed the problem.

**WesW** · July 30, 2000, 02:46

Well, needless to say, this news about the Wonders is VERY disappointing. I am going to keep playing my current game to see for myself, but if two people have run into the same problem, and a power of 2 seems to be the crucial point, then it's probably a code limitation that can't be fixed by us.

I also didn't realize that Mao's book would allow you to max out your wgf bars without penalty. I meant for that wonder to act like a happiness one, and only affect unhappiness due to overcrowding. If we have to take out wonders, this will be the first one to go. If the cutoff point begins with Equal Rights, that will be 13 wonders.
The AIs seem to put the lowest priority on happiness as far as city improvements go, so I added a lot of happiness wonders to try and get the AIs to keep happiness up that way. I will try and check my current game to see if this is working.
As far as wonders to cut, I will take out the ones which only affect certain circumstances, like the Trans-Atlantic Cable, or have specialized effects, like the US Constitution and Gandhi's Rebellion. The Statue of Liberty and Disneyland could be done without as well if they had to be. Ditto for the Crusades and the Inquisition.

There are 5 original wonders that I think we can do just as easily without.
No.1 is Hollywood. I mean, does the AI build many Television improvements?
No.2 is the Dino Park, whose effect so much depends on the city it is built in. This wonder is great for the human, but I don't think the AI knows how to use it.
No.3 the AI Entity, which seems to spell doom for the player that builds it.
No.4 the Egalitarian Proclamation, whose effect is specialized and short-lived, and
No.5 the Nanite Defuser, since the AIs don't use nukes effectively and the premise is pretty far-fetched.
Take out these 5, plus
1 Mao's Book
2 Inquisition
3 Crusades
4 Statue of Liberty
5 US Constitution
6 Gandhi's Rebellion
7 Trans-Atlantic Cable
8 Disneyland

I think we could do without these and not take away substantially from the game. What do the rest of you think?
[This message has been edited by WesW (edited July 30, 2000).]

**BigJ** · July 30, 2000, 04:51

WesW,
I pretty much agree with your selection of wonders to remove. The trade wonders (crusades, disney, dino) I don't even use myself really. Ditto for others like ghandi's, unless I need a quick boost, cause the celebrate for a number of turns flag lets you max your wgf bars. I usually don't use hollywood either, and by the time trans-atlantic is available I can solve distance unhappiness problems by rush-buying improvements. I do, however, like to have embassies with everyone, and taking out the wonder (us constitution or statue, I can't remember at the moment) near the modern age that gives them I'm not so sure about. It leaves a gap between philosophers stone and esp center, and I am usually too busy with other stuff to want to have to send diplomats around the world at that time. But then again, philosophers stone does come early and helps with science by trading and gives you knowledge of other civs that is crucial early on to figure out how you're doing.

Inquisition and mao's book are really kind of dangerous if you're not ahead. If an ai player researches the obsolete advance while you have your wgf bars maxed, well, there goes your civ, as my other game demonstrated when the egyptians lost mao's book. Also while you have them they are very powerful, and the negative science effect you can counter by reducing wages and getting more people for scientists and conquering. So I wouldn't miss these too much.

An idea though- WesW, if you intended them to help with happiness you could just use the reduce overcrowding flag, maybe for about 5 or more, at least enough that they are differentiated from a normal happiness improvement, and maybe give them another effect (besides the already included science penalty). Basically I was just thinking that it wouldn't hurt to have some more 'interesting' wonders, besides just normal happiness ones (for ex- darwin's wonder, which besides increasing science also decreases happiness, seems pretty wicked to me.

Actually, the only one I might miss would be the AI entity. I like to have one wonder that makes everyone content. Its mainly a personal preference though- I just love to see a rival civ get into a big civil war when it revolts. There are always mind controller improvements anyway. Once before I changed it, eliminating the chance to revolt, but giving it some substantial negative side effects (I don't remember what they were now).

In all, I think your choices are good WesW, though I wouldn't mind changing a few things around either. By the way, I took some of the wonders out to start a new game, but would it cause problems if they are still in the ai files? (I hope not!)

Announcement

Med Mod 4 problems/issues

Med Mod 4 problems/issues

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment