Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

SuperLeague Season 2: Sign up and discussion

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • SuperLeague Season 2: Sign up and discussion

    It's on again, Super League, the team ladder.

    Basically, it's teams of 2, playing off against the other teams for points, both in 2 and 4 player games (in teams). There was quite an elaborate points system in the 1st season (link below), but everythings up for renogotiation at this stage.

    I for one would like to see a draw, every team playing every other team, and 2 teams only playing each other once in single player games (ie, if teammember A1 from A plays Teammember B1 from B, A2 cannot play B2)


    But, as I say, the purpose of this thread is to thrash these details out.

    Thankyou checkMate for volunteering to keep the ladder updated.

    Oh, by the way, last season single player games counted (if both players agreed) in the PBEM Challenge Ladder, I suggest we maintain this.

    Here's the second thread of the 1st season, the link to the 1st thread will be on it.

  • #2
    how about a pure table of teams, like the word 'League' suggests ?

    doesnt have to exclude any part of the current system. might be an addition.

    what i mean is this:

    the 'League' consists of all the 2 person teams and every team plays every other team.
    there is a score for winning games (matches) and an in-game detailed score (score).

    the first criterion for the ranking table then are the matches won by a team. in case of a tie with another team, the score will determine the position.

    for example, the completed table after a season might look like this:

    Rank / Team / Match Points / Total Matches / Score

    1. / Team E / 9 / 5 / 67
    2. / Team C / 6 / 5 / 45
    3. / Team D / 6 / 5 / 38
    4. / Team A / 5 / 5 / 42
    5. / Team F / 3 / 5 / 29
    6. / Team B / 1 / 5 / 28

    got the point ?
    what do you think ?
    Baal: "You dare mock me ?"
    O'Neill: "Baal, c'mon, you should know ... Of course I dare mock you."

    Comment


    • #3
      I like it

      Comment


      • #4
        one way or the other,
        im in with you, ricketyclik, if you still want me.
        Baal: "You dare mock me ?"
        O'Neill: "Baal, c'mon, you should know ... Of course I dare mock you."

        Comment


        • #5
          i'm in
          I heard a loud voice, I looked, and there before me was a pale horse! It's rider was named Death, and hades was following close behind him. They were given power over one fourth of the earth to kill by the sword, famine and plague.
          Revelation 6:8

          Comment


          • #6
            does this mean that the league goes into a new season and/or complete restart ?
            Baal: "You dare mock me ?"
            O'Neill: "Baal, c'mon, you should know ... Of course I dare mock you."

            Comment


            • #7
              Anyone looking for a team mate?
              So one guy turns to another guy and says "T.A.I." His friends says "What?" He responds by saing "Think about it;)"

              Comment


              • #8
                Are we going to have a similar team draw to last time (i.e. the players are divided into strong and weak, and strong pairs with weak)?

                I think this is how the teams were "reletavely" even last time.

                Also, I concur with Rickety about everyone playing everyone (except for teams). The 2x2 games should still count for double points, and speed of victory should be accounted for.

                Either way, I'm in for another season

                Comment


                • #9
                  Originally posted by Frozzy
                  Are we going to have a similar team draw to last time (i.e. the players are divided into strong and weak, and strong pairs with weak)?

                  I think this is how the teams were "reletavely" even last time.

                  Also, I concur with Rickety about everyone playing everyone (except for teams). The 2x2 games should still count for double points, and speed of victory should be accounted for.

                  Either way, I'm in for another season
                  so what kind of ranking system are we talking about here ?
                  and what is the basic concept of it, meaning who gets ranked for what ?

                  i would suggest the league system i described above, possibly with single player games thrown in.

                  each team would play each other team once in a 2on2 game and would choose a 'representative' in each of 4 single player games with each other team.

                  so considering 5 teams total, there would be 4 team games for each team and 4 single player games, two of which player 1 of the team would play and two of which player 2 would play (so as to divide the single player games evenly among the team members).

                  a team game would count as 2 points, a single player game as 1 point.
                  the speed and other criteria used before would go into the 'score' of the teams, which, as stated above, would be tie-breakers if the match points of two teams are equal.
                  Baal: "You dare mock me ?"
                  O'Neill: "Baal, c'mon, you should know ... Of course I dare mock you."

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Last round I think (IIRC):

                    1x1: 1 pt for leading at the *9
                    10 pts for winning
                    +10 for winning via Bloodlust
                    +5 for winning in under 150 turns

                    2 pts for your team if 1st
                    1 pt for your team if 2nd
                    20 pts for winning
                    +15 for winning via Bloodlust
                    +10 for winning in Under 150 turns

                    All these points were accredited to your team total.

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      so there was only a team ranking, but each player could also gain points for his team by winning single player games ?
                      Baal: "You dare mock me ?"
                      O'Neill: "Baal, c'mon, you should know ... Of course I dare mock you."

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        Yes.

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          Math I like your idea for the new season, I think it will work fine with the rules from the old season. The major problem with having superleague seasons is that the 4-player game lasts so much longer than the 2-person match does. Math in case you didn't know, we are all still playing our 2 vs 2 games from the first season.

                          I think we need to discuss a way to get past this. Maybe we should have each player play every other player from opposing teams, but only one single-player at a time between teams. For example, A1 would play B2, and after that game ended, B1 would play A2. At the same time, A1 and A2 would be playing B1 and B2 in a 2 vs. 2 game.

                          We can also make a rule that all 2 vs. 2 matches have to be on a tiny map, which should speed up the game significantly.
                          Humanity has the stars in its future, and that future is too important to be lost under the burden of juvenile folly and ignorant superstition.
                          - Isaac Asimov, 1920-1992

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            We can also make a rule that all 2 vs. 2 matches have to be on a tiny map, which should speed up the game significantly.
                            And with Keygen's quick start mod, and the turn go full circle within 48 hours or points will be deducted. If a player is away, his partner can play the turn for him.

                            Comment


                            • #15
                              i'd rather have the games last longer than deduct points or fun (like tiny maps which i dont like too much)

                              but i like your idea, david, to have the second single player match start when the first ended. this way, there is also some kind of revenge involved.

                              quick start mod is a good idea, though im quite a purist and generally prefer no to use such 'helping' mods that even out the starting conditions, but i see that it will likely be necessary.

                              how long has it been since the start of last season ?
                              i mean i real season i sports like soccer, football, ... take a full year too.
                              Baal: "You dare mock me ?"
                              O'Neill: "Baal, c'mon, you should know ... Of course I dare mock you."

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              X