Announcement

**DrSpike** · February 19, 2008, 15:22

Obviously it should. But on the plus side it does arrange all the Spore threads in one place where they can be easily ignored (or actually read if you're a Sunday gamer who likes that sort of thing).

**Adagio** · February 19, 2008, 15:23

Could we hide the Spore forum for DrSpike?

**Solver** · February 19, 2008, 17:26

I am rather leaning to hiding DrSpike from all the forums

**DrSpike** · February 19, 2008, 18:05

I fear the damage to the (alreayd limited) wit remaining on this forum would be terminal.

**Krill** · February 19, 2008, 18:32

Don't worry, it'll expediate my raise to fill your spot on the panel of deities

**LordShiva** · February 19, 2008, 19:17

Originally posted by DrSpike
I fear the damage to the (alreayd limited) wit remaining on this forum would be terminal.

A small price to pay for an increase in spelling quality.

**DrSpike** · February 19, 2008, 19:28

I considered editing that afterwards, but for some reason I made the presumption no one would be enough of a pedant to point it out. Not sure what came over me to be honest.

**notyoueither** · February 20, 2008, 02:05

Originally posted by Krill

What about moving them to be subfora of other games? It would be pretty sad to lose at least a couple of the fora, but on the other hand, it has been along time, so maybe one or two teams would reconsider opening their fora...

Moving them would be preferable to opening forums that should not be opened.

**Locutus** · February 20, 2008, 08:54

Originally posted by notyoueither
Will archived forums be visible to all?

Shouldn't be but I'll double-check with Gramphos.

If yes, then you should know that some dg teams may have wished to avoid their forums ever becoming public.

I am on at least one team where there could be problems if the forum is ever open to general browsing.

I'm aware of that.

In most cases I think it'd be good for full disclosure to open up the team forums for all to see (and on top of that it's just fun to find out the other sides of the story). Especially long after the game is over that should normally not be an issue. In case of some of the Civ3 teams though I agree opening them up would cause more problems than it solves, might be best to keep some or all of them as-is.

**DarkCloud** · February 24, 2008, 23:09

One idea- spell out BtS to say "Beyond the Sword" if there's actually room for it in the discussion tree. It would definitely encourage higher search scores for one, and for another... I had no idea what BtS stood for for the longest time.

**Lancer** · February 26, 2008, 08:33

Spam, if I never hear that word again it will be too soon. I've been accused of it a thousand times and my writings abused with that word. There are alot of people here that like to do something else besides put their slide rules to a simulation. There are other views on having fun that is quite wholesome though it might not make sense to some. When the OT isn't being abused or ignored it's being sliced and diced to death and modded over by a bunch of people who hardly ever use it. How is the OT doing btw?

Another question. Does it matter to you how the OT is doing?

**St Leo** · February 27, 2008, 12:22

Originally posted by Cyrion
IMO, the SL Forum should really remain as it is

I agree with Cyrion and Mercator. The Civ2 section works well right now.

Merging PBEM back into SLeague might reinvigorate it or do the opposite.

**Theben** · February 27, 2008, 21:10

Who is St Leo?

**Theben** · February 27, 2008, 21:18

Originally posted by DrSpike
I considered editing that afterwards, but for some reason I made the presumption no one would be enough of a pedant to point it out. Not sure what came over me to be honest.

You didn't feel anyone would dare move in on your monopoly?

**LordShiva** · February 27, 2008, 22:17

Originally posted by Theben
Who is St Leo?

Announcement

Major forum restructuring

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment